Force required to drive the Trommel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slimshady
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drive Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the force required to drive a trommel, including considerations for the kinetic coefficient of friction of bearings. Participants explore various factors that influence this calculation, including design variations and applications of trommels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on calculating the force required to drive a trommel and the kinetic coefficient of friction of bearings.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for more context about the specific trommel design to provide useful answers, suggesting that general questions may not yield effective responses.
  • A third participant notes the variety of trommel designs and their applications, indicating that these factors significantly affect the power required to drive the trommel.
  • It is mentioned that the kinetic friction coefficient is typically not calculated but rather taken from tribology tables or determined through testing.
  • A proposed approach suggests using a simple model to estimate power requirements based on mass throughput, height lifted, and the number of lifts, while also considering additional work needed for mixing materials like concrete.
  • There is a suggestion to account for bearing losses and the complexity introduced by separating materials during the trommel's operation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculation methods and the importance of trommel design specifics, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions made about trommel designs and operational conditions, as well as the potential variability in friction coefficients based on specific arrangements.

Slimshady
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I have to calculate force required to drive the trommel? I dont know how will i calculate the kinetic coefficient of friction of bearings? can someone please guide me?
I have to calculate force required to drive the trommel? I don't know how will i calculate the kinetic coefficient of friction of bearings? can some please guide me?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello @Slimshady ,
:welcome: ##\qquad ## !​

You mention 'the trommel' as if everybody should know what you are talking about. We aren't all expert telepathics, so a bit more information might be helpful!

For comparison: A question like "how big an engine is needed to propel the ship" doesn't generate very useful answers either !

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog and russ_watters
There are different designs for trommels, you definitely need to provide a sketch of your particular arrangement. For instance, there are trommels that just sit on tires or rollers, whilst others have a shaft running through the middle, with an electric motor in one end and several bearings along the shaft. They can be smaller than an oil drum and turned by hand, or as long as a couple of full sized containers. They also serve a multitude of applications, from mining to construction, or just trash segregation, which will affect the power required to drive the trommel.

You mentioned calculating a kinetic friction coefficient, but that is not something that is normally calculated, usually you either take a conservative number from a comprehensive tribology table, or you test your particular arrangement.
 
Slimshady said:
Summary:: I have to calculate force required to drive the trommel? I don't know how will i calculate the kinetic coefficient of friction of bearings? can someone please guide me?

I have to calculate force required to drive the trommel?
It depends on how accurate you want your answer to be. I suspect you might just be interested in a simple model in which you lift the load of 'stuff' by, say, the radius of the cylinder a number of times (assuming it's a dry / loose mix). I would think that bearing losses would be relatively insignificant.

So the power needed could be found from mass throughput per second times height lifted times number of times it's lifted. A first approximation would be to ignore the kinetic energy given to the stuff as it rotates around the axis.

I reckon that would give a good ball park figure for the motor power needed. Add at least 100% for work done on churning the material inside - such as liquid concrete- which would need work to be done on just stirring it up.

In the case of churning concrete, the engine power of a delivery truck motor could be known and also the mass of the mix and the rotation rate so you could check on how good my simple calculation is.

If a significant amount of stuff is separated from the main load on the way through (as in a seiving application) then that would be an added complication.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
723
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K