Forced oscillations and resonance (bis)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on clarifying the transition from equations 22.4 to 22.5 in Landau and Lifshitz's "Mechanics," specifically regarding forced oscillations. The general solution is presented as a combination of a homogeneous solution and a particular solution, with emphasis on the confusion surrounding the notation of constants like "a" and "a'." The limit as gamma approaches omega is highlighted, leading to a special solution that is derived from the forced oscillation equation. The author aims to provide clarity for others who may struggle with this section, correcting a previous error in their explanation. This insight is intended to assist future readers in understanding the concepts of forced oscillations and resonance more effectively.
giulioo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm studying from landau lifšits "mechanics". I had some troubles in section small oscillations-->forced oscillations, especially from eq 22.4 to eq 22.5

i searched the web and came across this:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/forced-oscillations-and-ressonance.488538/#post-3236442

this thread does not answer the questions i had. Now I know the answer but the thread is closed and I cannot reply. Therefore i write it here (hoping this is the correct place and that it will be helpful to someone). I'm answering question n 2) since the physical meaning of beta is (as any initial phase) just a traslation in time (question n 1) ).

first of all the general solution to equation 22.2 and 22.3 is 22.4:

$$ x=a \cos(\omega t+ \alpha) + \frac{f}{m (\omega^2-\gamma^2)} \cos (\gamma t +\beta)$$

L&L rewrites this in the form

$$ x= a' cos(\omega t + \alpha) + \frac{f}{m(\omega^2-\gamma^2)} [\cos (\gamma t +\beta)-\cos(\omega t+\beta)]$$
where
$$ a'=\frac{f}{m (\omega^2-\gamma^2)} \frac{\cos \beta}{\cos \alpha} + a $$

(note that a' is a function of ##\gamma##)
L&L does not write ##a'## but writes again ##a## (which is confusing). Now from this general solution he takes only the second addend as a particolar solution. then he takes the limit for ##\gamma \rightarrow \omega ##:
$$ \lim_{\gamma \rightarrow \omega} \frac{f}{m(\omega^2-\gamma^2)} [\cos (\gamma t +\beta)-\cos(\omega t+\beta)] = \frac{f}{2m\omega}t \sin(\omega t + \beta) $$

This is a special solution of ##\ddot{x}+\omega^2 x = f/m \cos(\omega t+\beta)## (in the limit ##\gamma \rightarrow \omega##). The general solution is the sum of a special solution plus the general solution of the homogeneus equation associated, which is just formula 22.5 :

$$x(t)= a \cos(\omega t+ \alpha) + \frac{f}{2m\omega}t \sin(\omega t + \beta) $$

remark: in this formula ##a## is the same as eq 22.4 (is a constant and is not ##a'##).

Hope someone will get benefit from this as i would have had yesterday ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry my bad, at line "This is a special solution..." i meant ##\ddot x+ \omega ^2 x =f/m \cos(\gamma t+\beta)## instead of ##\ddot x+ \omega ^2 x =f/m \cos(\omega t+\beta)##.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top