Forces and motion -- a monkey lifting a package up with a rope over a limb

AI Thread Summary
A 10 kg monkey climbs a massless rope over a frictionless limb to lift a 15 kg package from the ground. The professor's solution derives the minimum acceleration needed for the monkey to lift the package, calculating it to be 4.9 m/s². Questions arise regarding the sign convention used in the equations, specifically why the force is positive while the monkey's weight is negative, and whether tension can be disregarded in finding acceleration. It is clarified that the sign convention is arbitrary as long as it remains consistent, and using a free body diagram can aid in maintaining clarity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying physics principles and the role of tension in the scenario.
PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
A 10 kg monkey climbs up a massless rope that runs over a frictionless tree limb and back down to a 15 kg package on the ground. Part a) What is the magnitude of the least acceleration the monkey must have if it is to lift the package off the ground.

Professor's solution says:The force the monkey pulls downward on the rope has magnitude F. According to
Newton’s third law, the rope pulls upward on the monkey with a force of the same
magnitude, so Newton’s second law for forces acting on the monkey leads to eq(1)

$$F-m_mg=m_ma_m$$
where $$m_m$$ is the mass of the monkey and $$a_m$$ is its acceleration. Since the rope is massless
F = T is the tension in the rope. The rope pulls upward on the package with a force of
magnitude F, so Newton’s second law for the package is

$$F+F_N -m_g=m_pa_p$$
where $$m_p$$ is the mass of the package, $$a_p$$ is its acceleration, and $$F_N$$ is the normal force
exerted by the ground on it. Now, if F is the minimum force required to lift the package,
then$$ F_N = 0 $$and$$a_p = 0$$. According to the second law equation for the package, this means
$$F = m_pg$$ Substituting mpg for F in the equation for the monkey, we solve for $$a_m$$:

$$a=\frac{F-m_mg}{m_m}=\frac{(m_p-m_m)g}{m_m} = 4.9 m/s^2$$

2 questions on this: Why in the solution given above in eq(1) the F has a positive sign and the$$m_mg$$ has a negative one, shouldn't it be the other way round since the motion is anticlockwise so we take weight to be in the direction of motion this holding a positive sign and force a negative sign?

The other thing is it really that T=F, I thought that to find the acceleration, we shouldn't worry about tension because it will cancel anyway? Or is the F here a pulling force like any pulling force in normal life?

One more thing why did he consider $$a_p$$ negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Why in the solution given above in eq(1) the F has a positive sign
... etc

The sign convention is arbitrary - he was free to choose anything he liked as long as he was consistent.

It follows that you should choose the sign convention to be (a) easy to follow, and (b) makes the maths simpler.
You use a free body diagram to keep yourself consistent.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top