Forces and Systems Lab- Relationship questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating kinetic friction in various scenarios, including a level plane and inclined planes with upward and downward acceleration. The user presents experimental results for acceleration, tension, and kinetic friction coefficients, noting that greater acceleration correlates with increased frictional force opposing motion. A response confirms this observation and explains how to calculate percent error by comparing experimental and theoretical results. The percent error helps assess the accuracy of the findings against expected values. Understanding these relationships is crucial for the lab report's conclusions.
xkaibob
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a lab report due tomorrow on forces. Basically, we were supposed to calculate the kinetic friction of a "frictionless" system on a level place, an incline plane accelerating upwards, and an incline plane accelerating downwards.

I solved for mk by using the equation m(at + aA)= T-(mk)mg. I also calculated for tension and acceleration.

*Please note that the first m stands for mass of the sled, the (mk) means the kinetic frictional force, and the final m is the mass of the weight attatched.

This is my data thus far:

Experimental Results:

Level:
Acceleration: 4.89
Tension: .72
mk: .059

Downward Incline:
Acceleration: 6.642
Tension: .9798
mk: .087

Upward Incline:
Acceleration: 3.078
Tension: .454
mk: .039

Theoretical Results:

Level:
Acceleration: 4.038
Tension: .596
mk: .047

Downward Incline:
Acceleration: 5.885
Tension: .868
mk: .078

Upward Incline:
Acceleration: 3.478
Tension: .513
mk: .045


I've made the observation that the greater the acceleration, the greater the frictional force opposing the motion of the object.

Is that correct or am I missing something? And what am I supposed to incorporate the percent error of the frictional force for?

Thanks for any help. :]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your observation is correct. The greater the acceleration, the greater the frictional force opposing the motion of the object. This is because the more force you apply to an object, the more friction it will experience. To incorporate the percent error of the frictional force, you can calculate it by taking the difference between the experimental and theoretical results and dividing it by the theoretical result. For example, for the level plane, you would take (.059 - .047) / .047 = 22.4%. This provides an indication of how accurate your results are compared to the expected values.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top