Forces of a basin surrounding a drain

  • Thread starter Thread starter doneky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of an ice cube sliding in a circular path within a conical basin. Key points include the need to analyze forces acting on the ice cube, particularly the balance of gravitational and centripetal forces. Participants emphasize the importance of considering both horizontal and vertical force components to derive the necessary speed as a function of radius R. There is confusion regarding the role of the normal force and its components in the force balance equations. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying these concepts to the problem, particularly when considering changes in radius and their effects on speed and revolution time.
doneky
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A basin surrounding a drain has the shape of a circular cone opening upward, having everywhere an angle of 34.5° with the horizontal. A 28.5-g ice cube is set sliding around the cone without friction in a horizontal circle of radius R.

(a) Find the speed the ice cube must have as a function of R.

(b) Is any piece of data unnecessary for the solution? [YES]

(c) Suppose R is made two times larger. Will the required speed increase, decrease, or stay constant?

(d) Will the time required for each revolution increase, decrease, or stay constant?

If it changes, by what factor? (If it does not change, enter CONSTANT.)

(e) Do the answer to parts (c) and (d) seem contradictory? Explain.

Homework Equations


Sum of the forces = mac = mv2/R

The Attempt at a Solution


Attempted to draw a FBD and I still don't get it. From what I'm thinking, there's the force of gravity at an angle, and I guess that minus some sort of "normal" force would equal the centripetal force, but I don't think that's correct and I wouldn't even be able to get a normal force from that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
doneky said:
the force of gravity at an angle, and I guess that minus some sort of "normal" force would equal the centripetal force
Do you mean, only a component of gravity? Which angle? The normal and the centripetal are not in the same direction either.
doneky said:
I wouldn't even be able to get a normal force from that.
There are two approaches you can take.
1. Just go ahead and consider the force balance equation ΣF=ma in each of the horizontal and vertical directions.
2. Since you don't care to know the normal force, consider only the force balance equation tangentially to the surface.
 
haruspex said:
Do you mean, only a component of gravity? Which angle? The normal and the centripetal are not in the same direction either.
I'm kind of confused now. I don't know if what I said made sense. I meant that if you did a force balance equation along the surface of the water, you would get the component of mg that goes along the surface as well as some opposite (which is what I meant by "normal" because I didn't know a better term), and I claimed the difference between these would be the centripetal force but now that I think about it I don't think I could do that and I don't think it'd work.

haruspex said:
1. Just go ahead and consider the force balance equation ΣF=ma in each of the horizontal and vertical directions.
Horizontally, I can only imagine there being the inward centripetal force, and vertically I can only imagine the force of gravity. Is there something I'm missing?
 
doneky said:
Horizontally, I can only imagine there being the inward centripetal force, and vertically I can only imagine the force of gravity. Is there something I'm missing?
The centripetal force is a resultant, not an applied force. I.e. it is the ma part of the equation.
You seem to have forgotten the normal force now. That has horizontal and vertical components.
You mentioned water in your last post... what water?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top