Forces on an unusual supporting structure

  • Thread starter Thread starter nina
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Structure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the stress points and material strength required for a frame supporting a 10kg weight suspended from a vertical half-ellipse shape. The major stress points are identified at the upper left side of the "C" shape and where it meets the base. The user seeks guidance on the necessary dimensions of the "C" and the base size to prevent tipping. They are using Solidworks for modeling but need assistance with the relevant physics equations and calculations. The inquiry emphasizes the importance of balance and structural integrity in the design.
nina
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The frame must support a weight of 10kg, approximately 0.5m above the floor. The weight is suspended from the top of a vertical elipse shape, of which 1 side is missing. The bottom of the half elipse rests on a base.

It looks like a slightly straighter "C" with the weight hanging on the right hand side. The C is approximately 255mm across and 680mm tall.

I need to know where the major stress points are, how strong the frame material must be to avoid bending/breaking, and what shape the C needs to be, or the size of the base, to avoid the unit tipping over to the right.

Homework Equations


It's been a while since I've done physics A level, my notes are somewhere in a box halfway across the country, and I have no idea what formulae I'm looking for sadly.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have drawn out a squared version of the design, and tried modelling it in Solidworks to find the answer.

The most I have found is that the major stresses will be at the upper left hand side of the C, and at the bottom of the C where it meets the stand base.

The materials can be anything I want, I'm just after the load they must take in each direction!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is NOT my homework, I am not being marked on it... but it is a matter of balance. Please someone answer, I'm in desperate need!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top