Forecasting Monthly Expenditures Using Normal Distribution in Excel

physics911
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, everyone,

I have a quick question for normal distribution in Excel.

There's a construction project with the following monthly expenditures:

JUL 2008 $ 4,903
AUG 2008 $ 3,591
SEP 2008 $ 15,452
OCT 2008 $ 12,806
NOV 2008 $ 59,988
DEC 2008 $ 121,808
JAN 2009 $ 261,162
FEB 2009 $ 264,769
MAR 2009 $ 306,240
APR 2009 $ 438,695
MAY 2009 $ 397,569
JUN 2009 $ 345,190


The project's allocated amount is $12 million and the time period is from July 2008 to December 2010. Is there anyway I can forecast future monthly expenditures (from July 2009 & onwards) based on normal distribution model using Excel 2003?

Your input is greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

Physics911
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do those costs look normally distrubuted to you?

I think you'd do better to approach it from a linear regression point of view.BTW. This looks like homework. Is it?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top