Formalism for an extended object

  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
i am read a paper of name: "formalism for an extended object"(in spanish)..
a sub manifold of coordinates y^i i=0...p embebed in a manifold with coordinates x^u u=0...D with metric g_{uv}
the induced metric is:

h_{ij}=d_ix^ud_jx^vg_{uv}

The paper says that the energy momentum tensor is:
T^{uv}(Z^a)= \int\! dy^{p+1} \, \frac{\sqrt{h}}{\sqrt{g}}h^{ij}d_ix^ud_jx^v \delta (x^a-Z^a)

but the paper does not say : ¿what is Z^a and x^a?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


They are just dummy variables. Look at the Fourier transform, for instance

F(s) = \int \exp{(2 \pi i t s f(t))} dt

s and t are just dummy variables, similar to Z and x. While the Fourier transform transforms between the frequency and time domain, the transform you quote from the paper transforms the stress energy tensor between the representation in the original manifold coordinates and the submanifold coordinates. Though I'm not quite positive that I have the direction correct, it might do the reverse...
 


pervect said:
the transform you quote from the paper transforms the stress energy tensor between the representation in the original manifold coordinates and the submanifold coordinates. .


mmm thanks, but, i don't understand

x: manifold coordinate
y: submanifold coordinate

¿and z?
¿yo says :the transform is between the representation inthe original manifold (x?) and the submanifor coordinates(y?) ?
¿what is z?
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top