Formalism for an extended object

  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
i am read a paper of name: "formalism for an extended object"(in spanish)..
a sub manifold of coordinates y^i i=0...p embebed in a manifold with coordinates x^u u=0...D with metric g_{uv}
the induced metric is:

h_{ij}=d_ix^ud_jx^vg_{uv}

The paper says that the energy momentum tensor is:
T^{uv}(Z^a)= \int\! dy^{p+1} \, \frac{\sqrt{h}}{\sqrt{g}}h^{ij}d_ix^ud_jx^v \delta (x^a-Z^a)

but the paper does not say : ¿what is Z^a and x^a?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


They are just dummy variables. Look at the Fourier transform, for instance

F(s) = \int \exp{(2 \pi i t s f(t))} dt

s and t are just dummy variables, similar to Z and x. While the Fourier transform transforms between the frequency and time domain, the transform you quote from the paper transforms the stress energy tensor between the representation in the original manifold coordinates and the submanifold coordinates. Though I'm not quite positive that I have the direction correct, it might do the reverse...
 


pervect said:
the transform you quote from the paper transforms the stress energy tensor between the representation in the original manifold coordinates and the submanifold coordinates. .


mmm thanks, but, i don't understand

x: manifold coordinate
y: submanifold coordinate

¿and z?
¿yo says :the transform is between the representation inthe original manifold (x?) and the submanifor coordinates(y?) ?
¿what is z?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top