Forming Linear Equations From Non-Linear Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rearranging the equation T = 2pi [(32 L I)/(pi S d^4)]^1/2 to form a linear equation suitable for graphing. The main challenge is identifying the +b segment in the linear equation format y=mx+b, as the original equation consists of multiplication without an obvious additive constant. A suggested approach is to take the logarithm of the equation, which can help linearize the relationship between the variables. The user proposes graphing T^2 against L, with T^2 as y and L as x, while treating the constants S, d, and I as fixed parameters. This method allows for a linear representation, acknowledging that any intercept may result from experimental error.
K - Prime
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
For my first year formal lab I am having a little bit of trouble with one aspect, let's see if anyone can help

Im trying to rearrange the equation

T = 2pi [(32 L I)/(pi S d^4)]^1/2

...(sorry, i don't know how to use the better way of displaying math) to form a linear equation so it can be graphed as a line, but I am having a rough time of it. My biggest problem seems to be getting the + b segment (for the form y=mx+b), the + sign doesn't seem to want to show up when the origional equation is all multiplication. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which are variables and which are constants.

The simplest way of linearising products of things to various powers is simply to take logs.
 
Its an equation relating to a torsional pendulum with a metal disk at the end

I = moment of inertia for disk
L = length of suspending wire
S = shear modulus
d = diameter of suspending wire
T = period of rotation

the constants are S d and I

i think i need to graph T against L somehow
Ill give the log thing a shot
 
Last edited:
how does this sound, checking to see if I am in the ball park

T^2 = {[4 pi (32) I]/(S d^4)} L

where T^2 = y L = x and everything in {} is m, guessing b doesn't apply here and any intercept on the graph can be attributed to error
 
Last edited:
That would work provided you don't change the parameters in the { }.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top