Formula derivation connecting vertical water flowrate & horizontal distance moved by a suspended sphere

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a formula that connects the flow rate of water with the distance a sphere moves when suspended near a water jet, based on Bernoulli's principle and the Coanda effect. The student is attempting to understand how the pressure differences around the sphere influence its movement and seeks guidance on creating a Free Body diagram and relevant equations. Key concepts include the application of Reynolds Transport Theorem and the relationship between flow rate, deflection angle, and forces acting on the sphere. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem, suggesting that while theoretical solutions may be challenging, experimental data could reveal functional relationships. The student expresses some regret about the experiment choice but is encouraged to pursue the unique challenge it presents.
  • #31
printereater said:
oh Alright then I don't mind typing on latex, I just feel that I am wasting your time because I am taking forever to type
Don't worry about my time, I choose when or when not to waste it!
 
  • Haha
Likes Tom.G, MatinSAR, Delta2 and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
In x-coordinate direction,
$$-Tsin(\beta )-\dot{m}v_{0}sin\left ( \Theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$-W-\dot{m}v_{i}-\dot{m}v_{0}cos\left ( \Theta \right )$$
 
  • #33
printereater said:
In x-coordinate direction,
$$-Tsin(\beta )-\dot{m}v_{0}sin\left ( \Theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$-W-\dot{m}v_{i}-mv_{0}cos\left ( \Theta \right )$$
Equal signs are missing. Use code \theta for ##\theta##, and for trig use \sin , \cos for ##\sin, \cos##.

There is a missing force component in the y direction, and it doesn't seem like you are using the convention in the diagram...which is fine... but just state what your "positive convention" in each direction is clearly.
 
  • #34
erobz said:
Equal signs are missing. Use code \theta for ##\theta##, and for trig use \sin , \cos for ##\sin, \cos##.

There is a missing force component in the y direction, and it doesn't seem like you are using the convention in the diagram...which is fine... but just state what your "positive convention" in each direction is clearly.
In x-coordinate direction,
$$=T\sin(\beta )+\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$=W+\dot{m}v_{i}+\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right )+T\sin(\beta )$$
 
  • #35
printereater said:
In x-coordinate direction,
$$=T\sin(\beta )+\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$=W+\dot{m}v_{i}+\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right )+T\sin(\beta )$$
I'm not really sure what is happening with these equations.

It should be like ##something = something~else## not ## blank = something ##

And state your assumption for positive coordinate in each direction...they aren't making sense. I strongly suggest using the coordinate I have established in post #13 where down is positive y , and left is positive x.
 
  • #36
I am not really sure how I can label these equations, Can I write ##\sum F_{x} = ...##
 
  • #37
printereater said:
I am not really sure how I can label these equations, Can I write ##\sum F_{x} = ...##
That means "add up the forces on this side of the equation". Then you equate that to the momentum rate change ( the other side of the equation).
 
  • #38
erobz said:
That means "add up the forces on this side of the equation".
so ##F_{x}## and ##F_{y}## will suffice?
 
  • #39
printereater said:
so ##F_{x}## and ##F_{y}## will suffice?
No, the forces(external) go on the left side. There are two of them acting on the stuff inside the control volume. You have written them down...
 
  • #40
OHHH so the external forces are being balanced by the internal forces?
 
  • #41
But they seem to be acting in the same direction though
 
  • #42
Don't think about it like an internal force. Its really not. Think about it as Newton Second Law. But instead of the ##\frac{dp}{dt} = 0 ## when solid mass is in equilibrium, now we have fluid mass that is undergoing a change in momentum inside the control that must be accounted for, even though the control volume itself is stationary hence ##\frac{dp}{dt} \neq 0## here.

So you are adding up the external forces, and equating it to the rate of change of momentum (the flowing fluid mass momentum change within the control volume)
 
  • #43
erobz said:
Don't think about it like an internal force. Its really not. Think about it as Newton Second Law. But instead of the ##\frac{dp}{dt} = 0 ## when solid mass is in equilibrium, now we have fluid mass that is undergoing a change in momentum inside the control that must be accounted for, even though the control volume itself is stationary hence ##\frac{dp}{dt} \neq 0## here.
Oh, alright. So,
In x-coordinate direction,
$$T\sin(\beta )=\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$T\cos(\beta )+W=\dot{m}v_{i}+\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right )$$
 
  • #44
printereater said:
Oh, alright. So,
In x-coordinate direction,
$$T\sin(\beta )=\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$T\cos(\beta )+W=\dot{m}v_{i}+\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right )$$
Step in the right direction, but still not there. What is your convention for positive directions - are you using my diagram or making up your own?
 
  • #45
erobz said:
Step in the right direction, but still not there. What is your convention for positive directions - are you using my diagram or making up your own?
At first, i was using mine but after a while i started using yours. currently I am taking -ve x and -ve y directions as positive
 
  • #46
printereater said:
At first, i was using mine but after a while i started using yours
in y direction you have T and W acting in the same direction on the left hand side of the equation? And remember its outflow minus inflow on the right hand side.
 
  • #47
erobz said:
in y direction you have T and W acting in the same direction on the left hand side of the equation? And remember its outflow minus inflow on the right hand side.
ohhh sorry I just realised that. For the right hand side, I shouldn't be looking at the direction of the force? (for the outflow and inflow part)
 
  • #48
printereater said:
ohhh sorry I just realised that. For the right hand side, I shouldn't be looking at the direction of the force? (for the outflow and inflow part)
for that side you look at the direction of the flow velocity ##\vec{v}## w.r.t. your positive convention. But it is still outflow minus inflow.
 
  • #49
erobz said:
in y direction you have T and W acting in the same direction on the left hand side of the equation? And remember its outflow minus inflow on the right hand side.
In x-coordinate direction,
$$T\sin(\beta )=-\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$W-T\cos(\beta )=\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right)- \dot{m}v_{i}$$
 
  • #50
erobz said:
for that side you look at the direction of the flow velocity ##\vec{v}## w.r.t. your positive convention. But it is still outflow minus inflow.
wouldn't it just be ##\dot{m}v_{i}+\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right) ## then because both vectors are facing downwards?
 
  • #51
printereater said:
In x-coordinate direction,
$$T\sin(\beta )=\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$W-T\cos(\beta )=\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right)- \dot{m}v_{i}$$
Good.

Just to practice this whole convention issue you were(hopfully) having rewrite your equations for "up is positive" and "right is positive".
 
  • #52
erobz said:
Good.

Just to practice this whole convention issue you were(hopfully) having rewrite your equations for "up is positive" and "right is positive".
HAHAHA yea. btw for my x-coordinate direction it should be ##-\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )## and not ##\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )## right
 
  • #53
printereater said:
wouldn't it just be ##\dot{m}v_{i}+\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right) ## then because both vectors are facing downwards?
no, becuase it is outflow minus inflow vectorally

$$ \sum \vec{F} = \dot m \vec {v_o} - \dot m \vec {v_i}$$
 
  • #54
Oh so, I am not literally adding up the vectors, I am using the formula that was derived from Reynold's transport theorem?
 
  • #55
printereater said:
Oh so, I am not literally adding up the vectors, I am using the formula that was derived from Reynold's transport theorem?
yes, it is the simplified formula of RTT. The minus sign comes from the dot products in the full treatment.
 
  • #56
Got it. Alright, I need to go and sleep now. Thank you so much for your help, I really appreciate it so much. Can we continue tomorrow please
 
  • #57
printereater said:
Got it. Alright, I need to go and sleep now. Thank you so much for your help, I really appreciate it so much. Can we continue tomorrow please
Sounds good.
 
  • #58
erobz said:
I suspect it's not a trivial problem to solve theoretically. But experimentally, you should be able to find some functional relationship between the outflow angle and the mass flowrate. you have to measure ( control) incoming flowrate, and measure the angle of deflection.

You are going to be working with a control volume that is something like this:

View attachment 339090

And you apply Reynolds Transport Theorem - "The Momentum Equation" in fluid mechanics.

Which says for steady flow with uniform velocity distribution (one inlet-one outlet):

$$ \sum \vec{F} = \dot m \vec{v_o} - \dot m \vec{v_i} $$
Also, can you please show me how you simplify Reynold's transport theorem to this formula please or provide a website that shows it. I tried to look for it but I could not find anything
 
  • #59
printereater said:
Also, can you please show me how you simplify Reynold's transport theorem to this formula please or provide a website that shows it. I tried to look for it but I could not find anything
We can go over that tomorrow. But tomorrow as a favor to both of us(you and I) you can open with rewriting the equations for "up positive, right positive" just to be sure you aren't still confused(please). I'm hoping to see the step where you take the sign of ##v## relative to coordinate into consideration before simplifying. It's always trivial until we get into uncharted territory, then everyone forgets which way is up, and why that minus sign is there...
 
Last edited:
  • #60
printereater said:
In x-coordinate direction,
$$T\sin(\beta )=-\dot{m}v_{0}\sin\left ( \theta \right )$$

In y-coordinate direction,
$$W-T\cos(\beta )=\dot{m}v_{0}\cos\left ( \theta \right)- \dot{m}v_{i}$$
Change the sign back in the ##x## direction when you wake up...its not negative on the RHS.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K