Formula- first order correction to the n-th wave func

Imperatore
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Could anybody explain me why indeed we can express the first-order correction to the n-th wave function \psi_{n}^{1} by linear combination \sum_{m} c_{m}^{(n)}\psi_{m}^{o}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ##\psi_n## (if defined properly - you didn't specify where they come from) are a base of your vector space of wave functions. You can express every physical wave function with such a linear combination.
 
  • Like
Likes Imperatore
mfb said:
you didn't specify where they come from

It's Schrodinger equation to first order \lambda^{1} You can see it on page 224 in the Griffiths' Introduction to quantum mechnics
 
So I am curious, how we can expand the 2-nd order correction to the wave function ? ;)

http://iate.oac.uncor.edu/~manuel/libros/Modern%20Physics/Quantum%20Mechanics/
 
That page doesn't load.

In a similar way, but the equations get progressively more messy with each order. I don't have the book here.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top