What is the relationship between energy and speed in a Schwarzschild geometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephenmitten
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Formula Gr
stephenmitten
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If a stationary observer throws a rock out in the radial direction in a Schwarzschild geometry, what is the relationship between the energy of the rock and its speed in the observer's frame?

I'm a bit confused because the book seems to say it's E = \frac{m}{\sqrt{1-V^2}}, but I thought that only applied to inertial frames in special relativity.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That formula only makes sense if it is assumed that c=1, otherwise it could be written

E = \frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-V^2/c^2}}

which I don't recognise. Over to someone else.
 
If, with respect to an orthonormal frame on the observer's worldline, the rock has speed V on release, then, at release and with respect to this frame, the total energy of the rock is given by the same expression as in special relativity.
 
Thanks for the replies.

Is that because at release the positions of the observer and the rock coincide and since the spacetime is tangentially flat, the formula applies as in special relativity?

So is it true that if the rock's position was different from the observer's, the formula wouldn't apply?
 
Can someone tell me why the formula applies in this situation?
 
If, with respect to an orthonormal frame on the observer's worldline, the rock has speed LaTeX Code: V on release, then, at release and with respect to this frame, the total energy of the rock is given by the same expression as in special relativity.
Is that because at release the positions of the observer and the rock coincide and since the spacetime is tangentially flat, the formula applies as in special relativity?
Yes.
"Energy", especially "potential Energy" is a bit tricky, because for the latter there is not always a straightforward definition in GR.
So if you use local standards to measure the velocity of the stone, said formula holds. Energy is not conserved because you use a different frame for every point of the stone's worldline.
If you use a single (static) frame, like the Schwarzschild metric, there is a conserved quantity which one can identif with energy. If E_{kin} is the kinetic energy as defined above, E_{kin}\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r}} is the total energy, a constant.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top