Formulating an Eigenvector Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2.718281828459
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the eigenvalue equation for a double pendulum project, specifically addressing the equation (K - Mω²)α = 0. The user is confused about manipulating the equation to find eigenvalues, as their approach of multiplying by M's inverse did not yield correct results. Participants suggest checking the matrices K and M for errors and recommend finding the determinant of (K - ω²M) to identify the correct eigenvalues. The determinant method is emphasized as a reliable approach to solve for the normal mode frequencies in the system. Understanding this method is crucial for accurately determining the system's behavior.
2.718281828459
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am working on a project with a double pendulum and I am currently looking for the normal mode frequencies. I don't think that's too important to answer my question, but in the derivation I hit a point that look like this:(K-M\omega^{2})\alpha=0. Here, K and M are 2x2 square matrices. I want to solve for the eigenvalue here, but this doesn't follow the form that I normally have with eigenvector equations. If I rearrange this, I get K\alpha=M\omega^{2}\alpha which has a matrix on each side. Naturally I thought to multiply by the inverse of M on both sides to get M^{-1}K\alpha=\omega^{2}\alpha. However, this didn't give the correct result. Why not? How should it be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must have K or M wrong, or both.
Check again, or submit the original problem and your approach here.
 
Finding the eigenvalues of ##M^{-1}K## works. You must have made a mistake somewhere.

But you don't need to do that. Just find the determinant of ##K-\omega^2M##, and find the values of ##\omega## that make it zero.

$$\left|\begin{matrix} k_{11}-\omega^2m_{11} & k_{12}-\omega^2m_{12} \\
k_{21}-\omega^2m_{21} & k_{22}-\omega^2m_{22} \end{matrix} \right| = (k_{11}-\omega^2m_{11})(k_{22}-\omega^2m_{22}) - (k_{12}-\omega^2m_{12})(k_{21}-\omega^2m_{21}) $$
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top