Fossil fuels or mantle derived hydrocarbons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andre
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins of petroleum, debating whether it is biotic (derived from ancient organic matter) or abiotic (formed from mantle-derived hydrocarbons). A referenced paper argues that hydrocarbons cannot form spontaneously at pressures below approximately 30 kbar, suggesting that they originate from conditions found in the Earth's mantle. The current scholarly view on the origin of oil remains divided, with some supporting the fossil origin due to evidence such as the alignment of oil with polarized light, which indicates biological processes. The conversation highlights the complexity of understanding petroleum's origins, incorporating biological, chemical, and geophysical perspectives.
Andre
Messages
4,310
Reaction score
73
This question has biologic, chemical and geophysic elements but the question is for chemical specialists. Hence my choice to post it in "chemistry".

There is a consistent idea about fossil fuels - petroleum not being biotic but "mantle derived hydrocarbons". It has most probably been discussed before but:

http://www.gasresources.net/

This paper argues:

The H-C system does not spontaneously evolve heavy hydrocarbons at pressures less than approximately 30 kbar, even in the most favorable thermodynamic environment. The H-C system evolves hydrocarbons under pressures found in the mantle of the Earth, and at temperatures consistent with that environment.

So what would be the current scholar view about the origin of Earth oil? Fossil / biotic or abiotic?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I say fossil.
 
The strange part about most of the oil that comes from that ground is that it tends to align itself with polarized light. This is a very strong indication that it's made by living things.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top