Fossil Fuels vs. Natural Gas: Carbon Emissions Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the emissions of particulate matter from different fossil fuels, specifically questioning the assertion that coal and oil produce fewer emissions than natural gas. Participants clarify that coal combustion typically generates more soot and particulate matter compared to natural gas, which is considered cleaner due to its primary component being methane. The conversation highlights the complexity of combustion chemistry, noting that incomplete combustion, often influenced by insufficient oxygen, leads to higher particulate emissions. The role of combustion temperature is also addressed, with higher temperatures generally promoting more complete combustion and potentially reducing particulate formation. For further understanding, resources such as the U.S. Department of Energy's Combustion Research Facility and academic texts on combustion are recommended.
davidgrant23
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

Could someone explain to me why fossil fuels, such as coal and oil, produce fewer particulate matter emissions than natural gas?

Also, how would you expect the combustion temperature of these fuels to affect particulate emissions? Would a higher temperature lead to a more complete combustion and therefore fewer particulates (which are formed by incomplete combustion)?

Thanks,
Dave
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
davidgrant23 said:
Hi there,

Could someone explain to me why fossil fuels, such as coal and oil, produce fewer particulate matter emissions than natural gas?

IDK if this assertion is necessarily true. Can you provide a source? Combustion is a complex process, and various factors determine the amount of particulate matter emitted after burning various fuels.
Also, how would you expect the combustion temperature of these fuels to affect particulate emissions? Would a higher temperature lead to a more complete combustion and therefore fewer particulates (which are formed by incomplete combustion)?

Temperature is one variable. Obviously, if you burn a fuel with insufficient air or oxygen, combustion will be incomplete and particulate matter, composed of unburned carbon, will be produced.
 
davidgrant23 said:
Hi there,

Could someone explain to me why fossil fuels, such as coal and oil, produce fewer particulate matter emissions than natural gas?

Also, how would you expect the combustion temperature of these fuels to affect particulate emissions? Would a higher temperature lead to a more complete combustion and therefore fewer particulates (which are formed by incomplete combustion)?

Thanks,
Dave
I think that you have this backwards. Coal combustion produces the most soot. Natural gas combustion is very clean.

This (combustion chemistry) is a very complicated topic. Soot is produced by "condensation" of some relatively stable carbon-containing radical species. Things like the propargyl radical are believed to play an important role. I don't think that you produce many of these radicals when you burn natural gas, as the fuel is primarily methane (one carbon).

A good place to start looking for material is the website for the U.S. Department of Energy's Combustion Research Facility -- a part of Sandia Natioanal Laboratories in Livermore, CA. There is a very nice graduate-level textbook on combustion by Glassman: "Combustion", Academic Press.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top