Four Objects Groups: Is x^4=e Sufficient?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yetar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the condition x^4=e is sufficient to define a group as a four-object group. While it is acknowledged that there are only two four-object groups, the query arises about the exclusivity of the condition for groups with exactly four elements. It is pointed out that many groups, including those with more than four elements, can satisfy the equation x^4=e. Specifically, the existence of infinitely many groups, such as products of 4-groups, that meet this condition is highlighted. Thus, x^4=e is not sufficient to uniquely identify a four-object group.
yetar
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I know that there are only two four objects groups.
However, I want a term that will be true if and only M is a four objects group.
Will saying that for every x in M, x^4=e will be enought? (Apart from the fact the also a 2 objects group is such a group)
Or is it possible that for every x in M, x^4=e also for groups with more then 4 objects in it?

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are infinitely many groups that satisfy x^4=4 for all x in G: any product of 4-groups for instance.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
460
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top