Four-vectors, Minkowsky spacetime.

  • Thread starter Thread starter norbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime
norbert
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
somebody know about this terms: "timelike, spacelike or lightlike"
they often are used in relativistic electrodynamic
i.e when I´m referring to the lightcone in a spacetime diagram.
I would like some physics-interpretation of this concepts.
thanks.
D. Norbert
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These basically apply to three different possibilities for the spacetime distance between two events: positive, negative or zero. Lightlike (or null separated) events have zero distance between them; how timelike and spacelike match up with positive and negative depends on the signature of your metric. Suppose we use Minkowski metric \eta_{\alpha\beta}=diag(1,-1,-1,-1), then spacelike means ds^2<0 and timelike means ds^2>0. Here's where the names come from.

If we have two events such that the spatial distance between them is equal to the time between them times the speed of light, i.e. ds^2=c^2dt^2-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2=0 then the events are lightlike since they can be connected by the path of a photon.

If there are two events that can't be joined by the path of any real particle (i.e. one traveling at or below the speed of light) then the events are spacelike. An example is two simultaneous (in a given frame) events at different spatial locations. Then dt^2=0 since no time elapses between the events, and ds^2=-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2<0. You can sort of think of it as being that they are spacelike because there is `more space than time between them'.

Finally, two events which can be joined by the path of a massive particle (i.e. traveling with v<c) are timelike - e.g. `more time than space between them' such as two events that happen in the same place but at different times. Then there is no spatial distance between them so dx^2=dy^2=dz^2=0 and we have ds^2=c^2dt^2&gt;0.
 
Just to add to mikeu's post,
timelike is a direction from the vertex pointing inside the lightcone,
lightlike (or null) is a direction from the vertex pointing along the lightcone,
spacelike is a direction from the vertex pointing outside the lightcone.


These adjectives apply to the generic four-vector, as well as the displacement four-vector.

Physically:
Timelike-related events are said to be "chronologically connected".
Nonspacelike-related events are said to be "causally connected".
Spacelike-related events are not causally connected. Such events cannot influence each other.
 
The physical interpretation is:

  • If two events have a timelike separation, then there is an inertial observer who thinks they occur at the same place
  • If two events have a spacelike separation, then there is an inertial observer who thinks they occur at the same time
  • If two events have a null (lightlike) separation, then a photon can pass between them
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top