Fourier series expansion of Sin(x)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fourier series expansion of the function Sin(x) within the interval -π to π. Participants are exploring the coefficients involved in the expansion and addressing potential errors in the application of the formulas.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants inquire about the correct formula for the Fourier expansion and discuss the coefficients a₀, aₙ, and bₙ, including their definitions and the nature of the integrals involved. There are attempts to clarify the integration limits and the implications of certain terms vanishing during calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the accuracy of the formulas presented and the integration boundaries. Some guidance has been offered regarding the coefficients, and there is acknowledgment of potential mistakes in calculations. Multiple interpretations of the formulas and their applications are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific integration limits and the distinction between definite and indefinite integrals, which are under scrutiny. Participants are also reflecting on their own calculations and the implications of their results.

therimalaya
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
May be simple, but I'm getting problem with doing Fourier series expansion of Sin(x) for -pi\leqx\leqpi
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What does the formula for the Fourier expansion of a general function f(x) look like?
 


CompuChip said:
What does the formula for the Fourier expansion of a general function f(x) look like?

f(x)=ao+\sum(ancos(nx)+bnsin(nx))

where,
ao=\frac{1}{\pi}\intf(x) dx
an=\frac{1}{2\pi}\intf(x)cos(nx) dx
bn=\frac{1}{2\pi}\intf(x)sin(nx) dx
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Isn't it supposed to be 1/pi for both a_n and b_n and 1/2pi for a_0? And in the formulae for a_n, b_n, these are supposed to be definite integrals not indefinite ones.
 
Last edited:


Anyway, for the sine you can either calculate all these coefficients, but you can also just read off the values from the general expression.

HallsOfIvy, you may be right, didn't notice that. Asked the mods to look into it and maybe split the thread.[/size]
 


Defennder said:
Isn't it supposed to be 1/pi for both a_n and b_n and 1/2pi for a_0? And in the formulae for a_n, b_n, these are supposed to be definite integrals not indefinite ones.

Yes there is definite intergral from -infinity to +infinity. I missed that.
Sorry

----------------
Now playing: Various Artists - A house with no name - America
via FoxyTunes
 


CompuChip said:
Anyway, for the sine you can either calculate all these
----------------

HallsOfIvy, you may be right, didn't notice that. Asked the mods to look into it and maybe split the thread.[/size]

I've tried that, May be I might have done some mistake, The integral term while calculating a_o, a_n and b_n vanishes and results zero. That is why I kept this in this forum. Any way I'll try that.
Thank You
 
You mean they all vanished? Check again the ones for n = -1 and n = 1.
Also, check the integration boundaries. They are not (-\infty, \infty).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K