Fourier transform for beginners?

Abigale
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hallo,

I really don't understand Fourier transform.
Do somebody know a good book for beginners?
Something like Fourier transform for dummies or so?

I need it just for physics.
So it don't have to be to mathematical. ^^
THX
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid it has to be mathematical: the language of physics is maths.

The Fourier transform is just this:

##F(\nu)## is the Fourier transform of ##f(t)## if $$F(\nu) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(t)e^{-2\pi i\nu t}dt$$

That's it!

The rest is exploring the consequences.
You should start by finding the Fourier transform of ##f(t)=A\sin\omega t## ... I'm afraid you just have to do the math until you get it.

In a nutshell - you know how any function can be written as a sum of sine waves?
The Fourier transform is part of that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top