Fourier transform of laplace operator

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 23K views
LuisVela
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello Everybody.
I gave a quick look onto the internet but i couldn't get anything interesting.
Heres my problem.

Im solving the differential equation given by:

[tex](-\Delta+k^2)^2u=\delta[/tex]

Where [tex]\delta[/tex] is the dirac delta distribuiton (and u is thought as a distribution as well)

The first step in the book is to apply FT to both sides of the equation...

The result is:

[tex](4\pi^2\xi^2+k^2)^2\hat{u}=1[/tex]

...I do know that the FT of the Laplacian is [tex]-4\pi^2\xi^2[/tex], but when the whole parenthesis is squared, i just can follow it. I don't know how to get that result...

BTW..whats the meaning of [tex]\Delta^2[/tex]?

Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Represent u(x) as a Fourier transform of \hat{u}(xi). Also, write the Dirac delta as a Fourier transform integral. Then let the operator parenthesis act inside the integral sign.
 
I think i solved it.
Fourier acting on laplace squared being equal to the square of F on Laplace is actually easy to prove...
The only thing remaining to understand is the 'meaning' of laplace squared.
Laplace acting on a function is an operation from R3-->R1, so you can't apply Laplace over again to the result...
Is that how we interpret Laplace squared?...or maybe more like the biharmonic operator.??
 
The meaning of [itex]\Delta^{2} \, \varphi[/itex] is:

[tex] \Delta(\Delta \, \varphi) =[/tex]
[tex] = \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}} \left( \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial y^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial z^{2}}\right)[/tex]
[tex] + \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial y^{2}} \left( \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial y^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial z^{2}}\right)[/tex]
[tex] + \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial z^{2}} \left( \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial y^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} \, \varphi}{\partial z^{2}}\right) =[/tex]
[tex] = \frac{\partial^{4} \, \varphi}{\partial x^{4}} + \frac{\partial^{4} \, \varphi}{\partial y^{4}} + \frac{\partial^{4} \, \varphi}{\partial z^{4}} + 2 \, \frac{\partial^{4} \, \varphi}{\partial x^{2} \, \partial y^{2}} + 2 \, \frac{\partial^{4} \, \varphi}{\partial y^{2} \, \partial z^{2}} + 2 \, \frac{\partial^{4} \, \varphi}{\partial z^{2} \, \partial x^{2}}[/tex]
 
So it is the biharmonic operator indeed !
Thanks a loot