Fourier transform -> power spectrum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and the power spectrum of a signal. The DFT represents how a signal's frequency components are distributed, while the power spectral density (PSD) is derived from the square of the DFT's magnitude, indicating how power varies with frequency. It explains that periodic signals can be expressed as a sum of harmonics, with the fundamental frequency having the highest intensity. The inverse Fourier transform can be viewed as a sum of closely spaced harmonics, linking the amplitude of these harmonics to the energy spectral density. Overall, the conversation clarifies the connection between Fourier transforms and the power spectrum, enhancing understanding of signal analysis.
juef
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Fourier transform --> power spectrum

Hey all!

I've been learning about the discrete Fourier transform (and FFT too) recently. What I don't understand is why applying it to a signal gives its power spectrum. I am not really good in physics, so to me it just seems like a magical formulae, one might say. :)

I don't need a deep explanation; the basics would be more than enough to please me. It would already be much more than what I can find on math sites and books about the discrete Fourier transform.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inverse Fourier transform represents a signal as a sum (continuous or discrete) of frequency, each of one having an amplitude.

The (direct) Fourier transform represents this repartition of frequency from the signal. It describes how a signal is distributed along frequency.

The power spectral density (PSD) (or spectral power distribution (SPD) of the signal) are in fact the square of the FFT (magnitude). It describes how the power of a signal is distributed with frequency.
 
A periodical signal can be written as a sum of harmonics (using the harmonic form of the Fourier series), each harmonic having it's own intensity (which decreases as the frequency of the harmonic increases). This harmonics are not abstract mathematical stuff. You can observe them while trying to set a tv channel and you see that you can catch that channel on several frequencies (these are the harmonics). The best quality will have the first harmonic (the fundamental) because it has the highest intensity. If you set the channel on the 2nd harmonic you will see that it will be noisy, and if you set it on the 3rd it will be even more noisy (because it's intensity is lower).
Now if you think of the inverse Fourier transform (which is an integral) as of a sum of harmonics of very close frequencies you can find an analogy: the direct Fourier transform of the signal (found in the formula of the inverse transform) plays the same role as the amplitude of the harmonics in the Fourier series. That's why it is called "spectral density of the complex amplitude". As you know, the energy is proportional to the square of the amplitude(intensity) so, the energy spectral density will be the square of the modulus of the Fourier transform (the Fourier transform has complex value). If you consider that the signal is applied on an ideal resistor of 1 ohm you can say that the square of the modulus of the Fourier transform is the spectral density of the power.
 
Thank you both for this enlightment! I believe I understand much better now.

antonantal said:
As you know, the energy is proportional to the square of the amplitude(intensity)[...]

Ah, well, no I didn't :shy: I should have mentioned that I'm studying maths and not physics. Thanks again!
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
538
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top