Fractals and Chaos: What's the Connection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Apteronotus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chaos Fractals
Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've read a little bit about fractals, being self repeating shapes. Is there a connections between fractals and chaotic systems?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The usual "interesting question" about dynamic systems in general is "where does it go in the limit?" or "what are the attracting sets?". If a system is chaotic then the attracting (limit) sets will be fractal.
 
Apteronotus said:
Hi,

I've read a little bit about fractals, being self repeating shapes. Is there a connections between fractals and chaotic systems?

Thanks

Yes. I think that some state space trajectories in chaotic systems follow the path of fractals.
 
That is interesting.
So for all chaotic systems, the limit set is a fractal. Is this always true?
Does the reverse hold as well? (ie. Are all fractals the limit sets of some chaotic systems?)

Lastly, how trivial is it to find one given the other?
For example if we are given the fractal, can we find a chaotic system whose limit set is equal to the fractal?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top