MHB Free Digital Resources on Clifford Algebras - Get Recommendations Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Chaz
  • Start date Start date
The Chaz
Messages
206
Reaction score
0
Does anyone recommend a particular free (digital) resource on Clifford Algebras?

Besides the usual (wiki, wolfram, etc), if possible :D
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The Chaz said:
Does anyone recommend a particular free (digital) resource on Clifford Algebras?

Besides the usual (wiki, wolfram, etc), if possible :D

Which aspect of Clifford algebras? Their representation theory? Their relation to quadratic forms?
 
The Chaz said:
Does anyone recommend a particular free (digital) resource on Clifford Algebras?

Besides the usual (wiki, wolfram, etc), if possible :D

You might like this:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.5935v1.pdf

I haven't tried it myself, there's also the textbook geometric algebra for physicists by people from Cam univ.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'Useless continued fraction for 1'

I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
View full post »

Similar threads

I Clifford Algebra and its contributions to physics
Replies
11
Views
5K
MHB Large Prime number unable to compute
Replies
2
Views
8K
MHB Resource for learning linear algebra
Replies
5
Views
2K
Sources to study basic logic for precocious 10-year old?
Replies
43
Views
6K
Please recommend me a good math book prior to taking trigonometry
Replies
5
Views
2K
Other Best resources for self-studying math from K-12?
Replies
28
Views
6K
Intro Math Arithmetic/pre-algebra/basic geometry textbook recommendations
Replies
14
Views
3K
How much physics is needed for Bialek's Biophysics book?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Analysis Real Analysis (Baby Rudin vs Apostol)
Replies
4
Views
4K
MHB Is this a valid method for selecting a Simple Random Sample?
Replies
5
Views
11K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top