Free electron beam inducing an EM field in a target?

AI Thread Summary
An experimental setup involving a klystron tube or free electron laser with various target materials (conductive, possibly conductive, and non-conductive) aims to explore how an electron beam tuned between 200 and 1000 MHz induces electromagnetic fields. Free electrons would indeed generate time-varying electric and magnetic fields in these materials, with conductive targets producing additional currents that create their own fields. The response frequency of the materials will match the electron beam's pulse frequency, but this can be influenced by the material's characteristic response time. The discussion highlights that it is possible to detect not only the presence of the target but also some electromagnetic properties of the material. Overall, the interaction between free electrons and target materials can reveal significant insights into their electromagnetic characteristics.
TheIdeanator
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Consider the following experimental setup: the front half of a klystron tube (the electron gun and resonent cavity) or perhaps a free electron laser, several different targets consisting of a highly conductive(metal) object, a possibly conductive object(salt or clay), and a non-conductive object(silica), both in air and under a few feet underground(rock or dirt), as well as a reciever antenna.

If I tuned this electron beam to an equavelent frequency somewhere between 200 and 1000MHz, how would each target instance respond? Would an EM field of the same or similar frequency as the electron groupings be induced such that the receiving antenna could pick up the signal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically what I'm asking is if free electrons cause a target material to generate a magnetic field and that if the electrons arrived in pulses, would the strength of the field fluctuate similarly.
 
Yes. The free electrons would induce time varying electric and magnetic fields in the materials. In the conductive materials those fields would result in some currents which would also produce their own fields.
 
Many mechanisms can induce an electromagnetic field in materials. Which ones are the most relevant depends on the electron energy. You should say what energy you have in mind.
The response frequency of the material will certainly be the same as the pulse of your beam but this can be masked by the characteristic time with which the response last, if this one is much longer than 1/(pulse frequency). Characteristic times vary widely.
 
joly said:
The response frequency of the material will certainly be the same as the pulse of your beam but this can be masked by the characteristic time with which the response last, if this one is much longer than 1/(pulse frequency). Characteristic times vary widely.

Are you saying that I could not only detect the target's presence, but the material it's made of as well?
 
At least you could detect some of the electromagnetic properties of the target material.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
73
Views
8K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
55
Views
29K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top