Free Fall Question (Non-solvable 2nd order equation)

AI Thread Summary
A ball is thrown upward with an initial velocity of 20 m/s from a 50m tower and the problem asks for the time until it passes the tower again. The book's solution sets the top of the tower as y=0, leading to a time of 4.08 seconds. The discussion highlights the challenge of redefining the y-axis at ground level, which complicates the equation due to the ball's initial height. By adjusting the equation to account for the initial height, the same form is reached, confirming the solution's validity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the reference point in kinematic equations.
phys_student1
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is from "3000 solved problems in physics". Yes, I have the solution but
I still have a question.

a ball is thrown vertically upward with a velocity of 20 m/s from a top of a tower
having height of 50m. On its return it misses the tower and finally hits the ground.


What time t elapses from the moment the ball is thrown until it passes the edge of the tower?

The book solution is clear, it chooses y=0 to be at the top of the tower.
Then: y=vot + (1/2)at2
This is solved to give t=0 (the beginning) or t=4.08s.

OK, nice, but I'd like the y-axis to be at the ground. Clearly, I cannot apply the above equation,
because it will neglect the additional potential energy that the ball have when now it's 50m above
the y axis. (If I substituted 50 for y in the eqn, I'll get a non-solvable eqn, or, if you like, an imaginary solution).

So how can we solve this (without using the concept of energy) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking y= 0 at the bottom of the tower means each point will have "y" 50 higher than before- that will give you y= v_0t+ (1/2)at^2+ 50. And, since the problem asks for the time the ball passes the tower again, you want to know when the ball will again have height 50. That is, you want to solve
y= v_0t+ (1/2)at^2+ 50= 50

Subtract 50 from each side and you have exactly the same equation as before.
 
Just to add to what Halls' explained:
ali8 said:
Then: y=vot + (1/2)at2
This equation assumes that y = 0 at t = 0. A more general equation would have an arbitrary initial position y0:
y = y0 + v0t + (1/2)at2
 
Thanks a lot !

Yes, I should have used (delta y), rather than (y).

Many thanks again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top