What causes weightlessness in a free fall?

chaszz
Messages
59
Reaction score
2
Einstein said one his happiest realizations was that a person in free fall would feel no weight. Unless I am mistaken he said this. But didn't Newton realize this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think Newton did realize this. Einstein was given a huge hint by a guy fell 60ft and lived to tell the tale. He is reported to have said he felt 'weightless' whilst falling.
 
It depends on the definition of 'weight', 'weightless', and 'felt'.
 
You wouldn't actually be weightless in a freefall, but you would feel like it because the forces are canceled out.

Einstein did realize that an observer accelerating due to a rocket or other force is analogous to an observer accelerating due to gravity: http://www.astronomynotes.com/relativity/s3.htm he used this to formulate general relativity from special relativity
 
Viracocha said:
You wouldn't actually be weightless in a freefall, but you would feel like it because the forces are canceled out.
What forces are canceled out? In Newtonian physics there is no cancelation of forces for an object in free fall. There is only one force acting on such an object, and that force is gravity.

There is no cancelation of forces in general relativity, either. There is no force acting on an object in free fall in general relativity. Gravitation is not a force in general relativity. There is no local experiment that can distinguish free fall conditions from force-free conditions far removed from any gravitational source. The two situations are identical as far as general relativity is concerned.

Bottom line: You actually are weightless in a free fall in general relativity.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
7K
Replies
47
Views
6K
Back
Top