Free Falling (dynamics question)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raging Dragon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling
Raging Dragon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sky diver jumps off a plane that is at 9570.7m above the earth. Assuming a combination of stokes and Newtonian drag, where Fdrag=-m*b*v-m*b^2*v^2 and assume constant g=9.81, at what point is the KE of the skydiver equal to the energy dissapated by the drag force?

Homework Equations



Equating mg=Fdrag one can find b quite easily.

I've derived through solving a nonlinear ODE Fnet=m*vdot=m*g-m*b*v-m*b^2*v^ 2 that

v(t)=-10.10573478+64.10573477*tanh(.1569282379*t+.1589673340)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I know that Gravitational Potential energy is =m*g*h=m*9.81*9570.7

Then I figure that PE=GPE (initially) for max h.

then when the sky diver jumps that PE=GPE+KE+Drag Energy

Now my question is to find the drag energy, do I integrate F_drag with respect to v, or t?

Then I take it that you need to also determine the time and distance fallen for this to happen, so then you goet PE-GPE=KE+Drag Energy and then KE=Drag Energy=(PE-GPE)/2

This make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy dissipated by the drag force is the negative of the (negative) work it does on the diver, which is the integral of the force over the distance the diver falls.
 
Thanks for explaining what the boundary of the integral is, but against which variable if I have force as a function of velocity, and I have velocity as a function time?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top