Free falling with air resistance question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the distance traveled by an object falling under gravity and air resistance, characterized by the equation dv/dt = g - γv. A key point is the misunderstanding of integrating this equation, as velocity is not constant over time. The correct approach involves using the terminal velocity v∞ and the characteristic time τ to express the distance d at time t. It is clarified that while the velocity approaches terminal velocity as t becomes much larger than τ, the exact distance must be calculated considering the time variable. Ultimately, the solution emphasizes that terminal velocity is reached only after sufficient time, typically around 5τ for practical purposes.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


An object falls under gravity and air resistance force bv. It is known there is a characteristic time τ=m/b such that the object comes close to the terminal velocity for t>>τ. Derive an exact expression for the distance d traveled at time t.

Homework Equations


not sure, dv/dt=g-γv...(1) ,where γ=b/m, or v=v∞(1-e^(-γt))...(2) , v∞=g/γ...(3)

The Attempt at a Solution


the answer is d=mgτ/eb.
First, I don't understand why can't I integrate equation (1) this way...
dv/dt=g-γv
v=gt-γd
d=(gt-v)/γ =gτ^2-gτ^2 =0 which is wrong

Then, I tried to integrate equation (2),
d=v∞(t+γe^(-γt))+C
put t=0,v=0,d=0
C=-v∞γ=-g
so,
d=v∞(t+γe^(-γt))-g
putting the information inside
d=gτ(τ+(1/τe))-g
=gτ^2 + g/e -g
=(gτ^2e+g-ge) /e

PLEASE HELP , THX
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:
First, I don't understand why can't I integrate equation (1) this way...
dv/dt=g-γv
v=gt-γd
dv/dt=g-γv is a differential equation which describes velocity as a function of time i.e. v(t). Velocity is not constant w.r.t. time but is a function of time .So, you can't integrate the RHS as ∫(g-γv)dt. You'll have to separate the appropriate variables.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
Derive an exact expression for the distance d traveled at time t.
The answer given for d is true for t=τ and not t>>τ.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
1.
3. The Attempt at a Solution

the answer is d=mgτ/eb.
First, I don't understand why can't I integrate equation (1) this way...
dv/dt=g-γv
v=gt-γd
d=(gt-v)/γ =gτ^2-gτ^2 =0 which is wrong
You can integrate that way (taking definite integrals in both sides with time points t=0 and ##t=\tau##) but ##v(\tau)## is not equal to ##g\tau## because the object doesn't do free fall exactly.

Then, I tried to integrate equation (2),
d=v∞(t+γe^(-γt))+C
put t=0,v=0,d=0
C=-v∞γ=-g
so,
d=v∞(t+γe^(-γt))-g
putting the information inside
d=gτ(τ+(1/τe))-g
=gτ^2 + g/e -g
=(gτ^2e+g-ge) /e

PLEASE HELP , THX
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Delta² said:
You can integrate that way (taking definite integrals in both sides with time points t=0 and ##t=\tau##) but ##v(\tau)## is not equal to ##g\tau## because the object doesn't do free fall exactly.

Thanks. But at time t>>τ, I set dv/dt = 0, then dv/dt = g-γv , so itsn't v=gτ (1/γ = τ)?
 
Clara Chung said:
Thanks. But at time t>>τ, I set dv/dt = 0, then dv/dt = g-γv , so itsn't v=gτ (1/γ = τ)?

yes that's correct. But this doesn't mean that d=0, it is still ##d=(gt-v)/\gamma## where ##t>>\tau## not ##t=\tau##
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
Thanks. But at time t>>τ, I set dv/dt = 0, then dv/dt = g-γv , so itsn't v=gτ (1/γ = τ)?
t>>τ implies that the velocity at time t is g/γ. At time τ, the velocity is still changing.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
Thanks. But at time t>>τ, I set dv/dt = 0, then dv/dt = g-γv , so itsn't v=g/γ?

Oh I got it.:) But how to solve the question with equation (2) now?
 
You can continue with the initial approach and plug in ##v(\tau)## from the equation ##v(t)=v_{\infty}(1-e^{-\gamma t})##.

Or as you go by integrating (2) I see a mistake in the integration, it is ##\int -e^{-\gamma t}=\frac{e^{-\gamma t}}{\gamma}+C##

But you got me confused, you want d at time ##\tau## or d at time ##t>>\tau##?
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
  • #10
Delta² said:
You can continue with the initial approach and plug in ##v(\tau)## from the equation ##v(t)=v_{\infty}(1-e^{-\gamma t})##.

Or as you go by integrating (2) I see a mistake in the integration, it is ##\int -e^{-\gamma t}=\frac{e^{-\gamma t}}{\gamma}+C##

But you got me confused, you want d at time ##\tau## or d at time ##t>>\tau##?
Oh my god... thanks for reminding me, now I've solved it
 
  • #11
Clara Chung said:
Oh my god... thanks for reminding me, now I've solved it

I think the question need me to find t tends to τ, as v at τ is the same as t>>τ ,so my dv/dt can't set to be 0 as the curve hasn't level off. Not sure about it
 
  • #12
No sorry velocity at time ##t=\tau## is quite different from velocity at time ##t>>\tau##.

The velocity at time ##t=10\tau## is probably close enough to the final velocity ##v_{\infty}##
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
  • #13
Clara Chung said:
as v at τ is the same as t>>τ
No. Terminal velocity is attained at t>>τ. As Delta2 said, it could be 10τ. In fact, the output is approximately equal to the steady state value after 5τ (99%). So practically, for any value of t after t=5τ, the output can be said to have reached steady state.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Back
Top