A Frequency analysis of signal with unknown period

petterg
Messages
162
Reaction score
7
I was reading up on (discrete) Fourier transform when my mind started to think of an what-if scenario:

Assumed I'm sampling a signal of the form
a1*sin(b1+c1) + a2*sin(b2+c2) + a3*sin(b3+c3) + ... + aN*sin(bN+cN) + some noise
where the a's represents magnitudes, b's represents frequencies and c's represents phases.
Assumed it is not know how low the lowest frequency is. It may not even be a full period within the time frame of sampling. Is there any way to find the frequencies represented in the data set?
(As I understand the DFT requires the sample set to be one repeating period of the signal.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the DFT the dwell time (the time between two samples) is 1/bandwidth, so the Nyquist frequency is half of that. That limits the highest frequency which can be faithfully represented without aliasing.

In contrast the total sampling time gives the inverse of the frequency resolution and determines how close two signals may be and still be distinguished. So this would determine how close a frequency could be to DC and still be detected.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
Thanks Dale
As expected this was out of range for DFT. What should I look into to solve this kind of problems?
 
Hey petterg.

If you are using statistical inference you could estimate the coefficients of each harmonic and make inferences on those.
 
petterg said:
Thanks Dale
As expected this was out of range for DFT. What should I look into to solve this kind of problems?
I would recommend just sampling longer. You can use model-based approaches if you know N.
 
Thanks
I pick statistical inference as my next reading
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top