Frequency of a proton moving in a circular orbit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the frequency of a proton moving in a circular orbit, particularly under relativistic conditions. It highlights that while classical mechanics suggests a direct relationship between speed and radius, relativistic effects cause the radius to increase more significantly as kinetic energy rises, leading to a decrease in frequency. The correct expression for frequency is derived from the relationship between charge, magnetic field, and relativistic mass, indicating that frequency remains constant only under non-relativistic conditions. A mistake in calculating the Lorentz factor, gamma, is identified, emphasizing the importance of using the correct formula. Ultimately, the conclusion is that frequency decreases as kinetic energy increases in a relativistic context.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement



upload_2017-12-26_17-36-32.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



[/B]Assuming that the relation ## v = \omega r ## is valid in relativistic calculation.

As the speed is greater for higher kinetic energy, ## \omega_2 ## is greater.

This is shown by only (d). So, I think (d) should be the correct answer.


## K.E._2 = (\gamma_2 -1) m_p c^2 = m_p c^2 ##

## v_2 = \frac { \sqrt{ 3}} 2 c ##

Similarly, ## v_1 = 0.6 c ##

## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} = \frac { v_1}{v_2} = \frac { 1.2}{\sqrt{ 3}} ##

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-26_17-36-32.png
    upload_2017-12-26_17-36-32.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 1,009
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not correct. Look up "cyclotron frequency" and take the appropriate ratio.
 
qvB = ## \frac { mv^2} r ##

## \frac { v} r = \frac { qB} m ##

So, the frequency is constant (independent of kinetic energy of the proton). Hence, the answer is option (a).

But then, v is different. Does it mean that r increases as v increases, that r is not constant?

Is this correct?
 
Pushoam said:
So, the frequency is constant (independent of kinetic energy of the proton).
Only if the proton is non-relativistic and ##m## is the rest mass. Is this the case here?
 
kuruman said:
Only if the proton is non-relativistic and ##m## is the rest mass. Is this the case here?

The proton's kinetic energy reaches to its rest mass energy. So, the calculation is relativistic.Classically, ## \frac { mv^2} r = qvB ## ...(1)

Relativistically,

## \vec F = \frac { d(\gamma m \vec v )}{dt} = \frac { d(\gamma)}{dt} m \vec v + \gamma \frac { d(m \vec v )}{dt} ##

## = \gamma ^3 \frac { v \dot v}{c^2} mv ~\hat \phi + \gamma \frac { mv^2} r (~ - \hat r) ## ...(2)Now, the ## ~\hat \phi ## component increase the speed, but it does not have any role in calculating frequency.

## \gamma \frac { mv^2} r = qvB ## ...(3)

Assuming ## v = \omega r ## ...(4)

## \omega = \frac { q B}{\gamma m} ## ...(5)

## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} = \frac { \gamma _2}{\gamma _1} = \frac {0.5 }{0.8} = \frac 5 8 ## ...(6)

But if ## v = \omega r ## is valid, then why ## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} \neq \frac { v_1}{v_2} ## ?

Is ## r_1 \neq r_2 ## ?

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Pushoam said:
Is ## r_1 \neq r_2## ?
Yes. The proton spirals out as it gains energy.
Also, I don't know where you got the ##\gamma## values in equation (6), but I know that ##\gamma## is always greater than or equal to 1. To find ##\gamma##, I would use the relativistic kinetic energy expression, ##K=(\gamma-1)m_0c^2##.
 
kuruman said:
I don't know where you got the γγ\gamma values in equation (6), but I know that γγ\gamma is always greater than or equal to 1.

The following is wrong. While doing calculation, I took ## \gamma = \sqrt { 1 - \frac {v^2}{c^2}} ## instead of ## \frac 1 {\sqrt { 1 - \frac {v^2}{c^2}}} ##.
Pushoam said:
## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} = \frac { \gamma _2}{\gamma _1} = \frac {0.5 }{0.8} = \frac 5 8 ## ...(6)
The correcct one is ## \frac { \omega_1}{\omega_2} = \frac { \gamma _2}{\gamma _1} = \frac {\frac 1 {0.5 }} {\frac 1 {0.8}} = \frac 8 5 ##

So, the frequency decreases as kinetic energy increases.
 
Right. In classical mechanics speed and radius change at the same rate, but relativistic the radius increases more (and the velocity is limited of course), so the frequency goes down with increasing energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
Back
Top