Frequency of Undamped Driven Oscillator near Zero

Click For Summary
In a spring-mass system subjected to a slowly varying force, the equilibrium between the applied force and the spring force is maintained due to the low frequency of oscillation. When the driving frequency is near zero, the system can adjust almost instantaneously to the applied force, resulting in minimal oscillation of the mass. This contrasts with scenarios where the driving force oscillates rapidly, causing significant displacement and phase differences. The discussion highlights that a slow driving force allows the spring to remain in a state of near-equilibrium, as the system does not have time to respond dynamically. Thus, the connection between low frequency and equilibrium is rooted in the system's ability to adapt to gradual changes.
Samama Fahim
Messages
52
Reaction score
4
Description of the Problem:
Consider a spring-mass system with spring constant ##k## and mass ##m##. Suppose I apply a force ##F_0 \cos(\omega t)## on the mass, but the frequency ##\omega## is very small, so small that it takes the system, say, a million years to reach a maximum and to go to 0 and so on. This is actually from the following lecture: by Walter Lewin. He argues that if the force goes so slowly then there must be equilibrium at all moment in time between the spring force and the force that we apply, and he does so without using the equation for amplitude of an undamped driven harmonic oscillator or the differential equation for such a motion. We should be able to guess it with common sense.

Equation: $$m\ddot{x} = -kx + F_0 \cos(\omega t)$$

Question: I suppose that there must be a common sense explanation of the driving force and the spring force cancelling each other or almost doing so when the frequency of the driving force is small or near zero. How does a force “going extremely slowly” make the spring force cancel or brings the system into equilibrium at all moments in time? What is the connection between this small frequency and the equilibrium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if this agrees with your common sense and/or helps, but here's one practical example that you might consider:
Suppose you are hanging a mass by a spring (or a rubber band or something similar), and the system is at equilibrium, with the spring stretched to whatever (additional) length is needed to counteract the force of gravity on the mass. Now imagine that you exert an oscillating force on the weight, in addition to the "balanced" force of the spring against gravity, by moving the support of the spring (or the rubber band) up and down. If you do this quickly, near the natural oscillating frequency of the spring, you can get the spring-mass system oscillating up and down a huge distance, nearly out of phase with your forcing. On the other hand, if you move the support up and down extremely slowly, the spring-mass hardly even "feels" the springiness. Instead, the mass moves up and down more or less exactly when you move the support up and down. The spring remains nearly in equilibrium at all times because of the huge mismatch in frequency between the spring-mass oscillation frequency and the external force.
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K