Frequency or phase shift when using pulsed wave doppler

AI Thread Summary
In pulsed wave Doppler imaging, the measurement focuses on phase shifts rather than frequency changes due to the limitations of gate time, which can introduce significant errors in frequency estimation. The necessity for a short gate time, ideally around 100 milliseconds, restricts the accuracy of frequency measurements to about ±10 Hz. In contrast, phase measurements allow for much greater precision, with a potential error of just 1 degree translating to a frequency deviation estimation that is 360 times more accurate. This method is particularly effective for detecting position shifts that are less than a wavelength between successive pulses. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate cardiac strain measurements using ultrasound.
mkh004
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm a medical student who is using ultrasound to measure cardiac strain. I'm trying to read up a bit on the physics behind doppler imaging (I did AP physics in high school), and I have a question for some genius out there. I keep reading that in pulsed wave doppler measurements, one does not measure the change in frequency, but a phase shift of the waves. Why?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To measure a freq. you have to count pulses over specific period of time , "gate" time. This period can't be too long, I'd think at least no more than 100 milliseconds for biological process, to keep update rate 10 Hz or so. This implies error in measurements, +-10 Hz. But if you measure a phase, there is no such limitation, and precision in estimation of deviation a frequency 360 times better for phase error 1 degree
 
Are you measuring distances less than a wavelength?
 
You typically are trying to measure position shifts of less than a wavelength between successive pulses.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top