Friction acting on a ball on an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
Friction is necessary for a ball to roll down an inclined plane without sliding, specifically static friction. In an ideal scenario, no work is done by friction, allowing all energy to convert into rotational kinetic energy without mechanical energy loss. However, real-world conditions introduce rolling friction and deformation, which can dissipate energy. The amount of friction required depends on the incline angle; insufficient friction will result in sliding instead of rolling. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing motion on inclined planes.
Mattowander
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
I just have a quick question. I know that at least some amount of friction is required in order for a ball to roll down an inclined plane and not just slide. My question is about the work done by friction in this situation. Is all of this energy converted to rotational kinetic energy or is there a loss of mechanical energy? Does it depend on how much friction there is between the ball and the ramp? I would appreciate any insight that you guys could give me on this situation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mattowander said:
My question is about the work done by friction in this situation.
Since the ball rolls without sliding, there is no work done by friction. Note that the friction involved is static friction.
Is all of this energy converted to rotational kinetic energy or is there a loss of mechanical energy?
Even though no work is done by friction, it does cause energy to be transformed into rotational KE. In the ideal case, there would be no loss in mechanical energy. (Of course, in real life there is rolling friction, deformation, etc., which does dissipate mechanical energy.)
Does it depend on how much friction there is between the ball and the ramp?
For any given angle, there is a certain amount of friction required. (You can calculate the needed friction using Newton's laws applied to translation and rotation.) If the surfaces are unable to provide that amount of friction, you'll get sliding.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top