Friction between two rotating cylinders

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the coefficient of friction between two hollow cylinders that rotate in opposite directions while in contact. The context includes both theoretical considerations and practical applications, specifically relating to a machine designed to simulate wear on drill pipe surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the setup involving two hollow cylinders, noting the specifics of their arrangement and the forces acting on them.
  • Another participant suggests a method to calculate the coefficient of friction by relating torque and normal force, proposing a substitution of terms from linear to rotational dynamics.
  • A participant questions whether the original problem is from a real-life scenario or a textbook, indicating a desire for practical relevance.
  • A participant shares their experience working with a machine that simulates wear on drill pipe, expressing a need for a formula applicable to various materials.
  • Some participants clarify that the coefficient of friction is unitless and discuss the implications of dividing torque by force, leading to a distance measurement.
  • Another participant proposes a formula for the coefficient of friction based on the torque and radius of the cylinders, seeking validation of their approach.
  • A later reply confirms the correctness of the proposed formulas, indicating agreement on the mathematical relationships discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying approaches to calculating the coefficient of friction, with some agreeing on the formulas presented while others raise questions about the practical application and assumptions involved. No consensus is reached on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for specific dimensions of the cylinders to accurately determine the coefficient of friction, highlighting potential limitations in the information provided.

Scooter057
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have two hollow cylinders of different sizes. The smaller cylinder is inside the larger cylinder but NOT concentrically. The OD of the smaller cylinder contacts the ID of the larger cylinder at the 6 o'clock position. Both cylinders rotate but in opposite directions. An actuator pushes the larger cylinder upwards applying a normal force to the smaller cylinder. I know the torque being applied to each cylinder, the constant rotational speeds of each cylinder and the force being applied to the actuator. I also know the weights of everything. How would i find the coefficient of friction of the two materials that are rubbing together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I'm under-thinking this but couldn't you work it like a linear problem and just change each term to be rotational? Force --> torque. speed (v) --> rotation speed (w).

(friction force) = (friction coefficient) * (normal force)

Speed is constant, so:
(friction force) = (applied torque)

Substitute that into the original equation:
(applied torque) = (friction coefficient) * (normal force)
(friction coefficient) = (applied torque) / (normal force)

You already know the torque on the small cylinder, and the normal force is just the net force acting upward on the small cylinder.

Please tell me how it goes :smile:
 
Last edited:
Scooter057 said:
I have two hollow cylinders of different sizes. The smaller cylinder is inside the larger cylinder but NOT concentrically. The OD of the smaller cylinder contacts the ID of the larger cylinder at the 6 o'clock position. Both cylinders rotate but in opposite directions. An actuator pushes the larger cylinder upwards applying a normal force to the smaller cylinder. I know the torque being applied to each cylinder, the constant rotational speeds of each cylinder and the force being applied to the actuator. I also know the weights of everything. How would i find the coefficient of friction of the two materials that are rubbing together?
Is this a real life problem that you are trying to solve, or is it from a textbook/course?
 
I work for a company that produced drill pipe. One of the engineers designed a machine that simulates the drill pipe wearing against the side of the hole. This particular machine uses two cylinders in contact rotating in opposite directions to measure the amount of wear to the surface of the drill pipe. I'm pretty new to the company and have been tasked with determining a formula for the coefficient of friction regardless of the two materials being worn. I have an idea about how to proceed I just want to get other opinions.
 
ShawnD said:
Maybe I'm under-thinking this but couldn't you work it like a linear problem and just change each term to be rotational? Force --> torque. speed (v) --> rotation speed (w).

(friction force) = (friction coefficient) * (normal force)

Speed is constant, so:
(friction force) = (applied torque)

Substitute that into the original equation:
(applied torque) = (friction coefficient) * (normal force)
(friction coefficient) = (applied torque) / (normal force)

You already know the torque on the small cylinder, and the normal force is just the net force acting upward on the small cylinder.

Please tell me how it goes :smile:


The coefficient of friction is a unitless number. Dividing a torque by a force gives you a distance. (Nm/N = m)
 
Scooter057 said:
The coefficient of friction is a unitless number. Dividing a torque by a force gives you a distance. (Nm/N = m)

If that's the case, we need to know either the inside diameter of the big pipe or the outside diameter of the small pipe.
 
If the radius of the big cylinder is r1 and the small cylinder r2, then I would think that the coefficient could be expressed as T1*r1/F where T1 is the torque on the big cylinder and F is the applied force. It would also be expressed as T2*r2/F. Does that sound right?
 
Yes. You are right. Your formulas are the good ones (I found the same).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K