Friction force calculation of syringe plunger

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the static friction of a syringe plunger's rubber seal. The user measured the push and pull forces required to move the plunger, with values of 0.625 and 0.677777778, respectively. Initially unsure how to derive the coefficient of friction from these measurements, the user later realized that a free body diagram allowed for the use of the measured forces directly. Another participant questioned the necessity of the coefficient if the friction force was already known. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding friction in mechanical systems.
ktm_rider
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

This is my first post here. I finally decided to sign up after using the site for many years.

I am working on a project involving a syringe mechanism. I am using a stock 6ml syringe. I'm trying to calculate the static friction of the rubber seal.

I have measured both the pull and push forces required to move the plunger, but am blanking on how to actually get the coefficient of friction from those numbers.

The pushing force is:0.625
The pulling force is: 0.677777778

Thank you for all the help!

Tyler
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you would have to know the force being applied to force the two surfaces together, not sliding back and forth over each other.
 
Hm, okay. Any suggestions on the best way to go about that?

Thank you
 
I think i figured it out.

After drawing out the free body diagram, I can use the actual forces i measured without having to solve for the coefficient of friction.

Thank you for your help Drakkith
 
Why do you need the coefficient if you have the friction force?

(edit: you figured it out while I was posting.)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top