Friction : impulsive or non impulsive?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swayne221b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between friction and normal reaction forces, questioning whether friction can be impulsive due to the impulsive nature of normal reactions. Examples provided include the effects of "English" on a cue ball in pool and the behavior of a spinning rubber ball. The conversation also touches on topspin in tennis, highlighting that different types of friction depend on surface characteristics and applied forces. Additionally, the concept of pressure drag is mentioned as a factor in understanding friction dynamics. Overall, the interplay between friction and impulsive forces is a key theme in this discussion.
swayne221b
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Maximum value of friction depends upon the normal reaction and normal reaction can be impulsive, so does that imply friction can be impulsive?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
swayne221b said:
Maximum value of friction depends upon the normal reaction and normal reaction can be impulsive, so does that imply friction can be impulsive?

Sure. A couple of examples that spring to mind are the application of "English" to the cue ball on a pool table and the behavior of a spinning rubber ball as it bounces.

Edit: And the application of topspin to a tennis shot as the racket hits the ball.
 
Last edited:
There are a bunch of different kinds of friction. It depends on the surfaces, forces, and definitely the impulses. If you account for pressure drag as a part of friction, it's kinda like skipping a rock.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top