Friction Torque and Lost Energy in Colliding Disks: Where Did it Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arman777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average frictional torque and the loss of kinetic energy when two colliding disks come to a common angular speed. The initial calculations for angular acceleration and speed of each disk were performed, but discrepancies arose in determining the kinetic energy loss. It was noted that using symbolic expressions rather than numerical values could yield more accurate results and reduce calculation errors. The final consensus indicated that the lost energy primarily converted to heat during the collision process. The importance of maintaining accuracy in calculations was emphasized, particularly in educational settings.
Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


Disks A and B each have a rotational inerita ##0.300 kg.m^2## about the central axis and a radius of of ##20.0cm##and are free to rotate on a central rod through both of them.To set them spinning around the rod in the same direction,each wrapped with a string that is pulled for ##10.0s## (the string detaches at the end).The magnitudes of the forces pulling the strings are ##30.0N## for a disk A and ##20.0N## for a disk B.After the strings detach,the disks happen to collide and frictional force between them to the same final angular speed in ##6.00s##
What are (a) magnitude of the average frictional torque that brings them to the final angular speed and (b) the loss in kinetic energy as the torque acts on them? (c) Where did the "lost energy" go ?

Homework Equations


##τ=rFsinθ##
##τ=I∝##

The Attempt at a Solution


First I found the angular accelerations for both objects
For A-
##τ=rF=I∝##

##∝=\frac {rF} {I}##

##∝=\frac {0.2m.30N} {0.3 kgm^2}=20\frac {rad} {s^2}##
For B-
##∝=\frac {0.2m.20N} {0.3 kgm^2}=13,3\frac {rad} {s^2}##

For angular speed (w) which they pulled ##10 sec##, so ##w-w_0=∝t##
##w_A=20.10=200\frac {rad} {s}##
##w_B=13,3.10=133\frac {rad} {s}##

They are coming equal in 6 sec so the change in ##w_A## is ##200-(\frac{200+133} {2})=33.5\frac {rad} {s}##

so angular acceleration is ##∝=\frac {33.5} {6}=5.58\frac {rad} {s^2}##
so
##τ=I∝=0.3.5.58=1.67N.m##

For (b)

Initial rotational kinetic energy for A is from ##\frac 1 2Iw^2=(0.5).(0.3) (200^2)##
Last kinetic energy for A is ##\frac 1 2Iw^2=(0.5).(0.3) (166.5^2)##
The difference is ##1841,66J## which its not the correct answer..

Or I tried ##Δ(E_r)=W=τΔθ=1.67Nm.33.5\frac {rad} {s}.6s=335.67J##
but answer says its ##333J##
Where I did wrong ?

And for answer c is of course heat

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arman777 said:
Where I did wrong
You stopped looking after considering A. What happens to B ?
The 333 or 336 comes about because you calculate with numbers instead of symbols. The advice is to work with symbols as long as feasible; then -- in the final expression -- a lot of things cancel and you get a more accurate answer.
Additional benefit: less typing on the calculator, less chance for typing errors and easier approximate checks on the numerical outcome.
 
BvU said:
You stopped looking after considering A. What happens to B ?
Ok for B I found ##1504.98J## so the difference between them should give us the result whch its approximatly ##336J##
BvU said:
The 333 or 336 comes about because you calculate with numbers instead of symbols
I found ##W=τΔθ## I can't use symbols after this ?
 
If logic is correct then I don't think 333J or 336J matter so much..?
 
Arman777 said:
I found ##W=\tau\delta\theta## I can't use symbols after this
You can express both factors in terms of given variables. If you do that, the correct answer is exactly 1000/3 J. You should do that exercise.

In such a calculation in an exercise, a 1% deviation is considered an error. Loss of score for no purpose.
 
  • Like
Likes Arman777
Ok I found by ##W=I(w^2)##

##0.3.({200-(\frac {1000} {6}))^2}=W##

from there I found,but in exam or somewhere else I wouldn't do this probably...

Thanks
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top