Frictionless ramp, constant velocity, find work

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work needed to push a piano weighing 1635.0 kg up a frictionless ramp to a height of 1.73 m, one can apply the principle of conservation of energy. The work done is equivalent to the gravitational potential energy gained by the piano, which is calculated using the formula U = mgh, where m is the mass, g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s²), and h is the height. Since the piano is moved at a constant velocity, all work done translates into potential energy without any losses to friction or acceleration. The resulting work required is significant, reflecting the energy needed to elevate the piano to the truck bed. This approach simplifies the problem by focusing solely on energy changes rather than forces or angles.
holls14
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Movers must push a piano onto a truck, the bed of which is a height 1.73 m above the ground. To do this they will use a frictionless ramp. If the piano has a mass of 1635.0 kg and the movers push it up the slope at a constant velocity, how much work do they need to do on it to move it into the bed? Please provide your answer in kilo-Joules (kJ), as the amount of work should be quite large.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have no clue where to start here, no angle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
holls14 said:

Homework Statement



Movers must push a piano onto a truck, the bed of which is a height 1.73 m above the ground. To do this they will use a frictionless ramp. If the piano has a mass of 1635.0 kg and the movers push it up the slope at a constant velocity, how much work do they need to do on it to move it into the bed? Please provide your answer in kilo-Joules (kJ), as the amount of work should be quite large.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have no clue where to start here, no angle?

Do not think of it as a dynamics problem with forces (i.e. you don't need an angle). This is a conservation of energy problem. The work you put into the moving the piano up 1.73 m turns into potential energy. If we think of it in reverse, the potential energy of the piano afterwards is equal to the _______ .

K + U (before) = K + U (after)

where K is kinetic energy and U is potential energy.

K = (1/2)mv2
U = mgh
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top