Friis Path Loss on a Segmented Path Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of Friis' Path Loss formula when dividing a transmission path into two segments. It asserts that the path loss in segments AB and BC should theoretically equal the total path loss in segment AC, but combining these losses requires careful consideration. The key point is that losses in tandem paths should be added in decibels, as attenuation occurs more significantly at the beginning of each path. Additionally, reflections at intermediate points, like point B, necessitate treating the path as two separate segments due to the nature of wavefronts. The conversation concludes that proper calculations depend on ensuring the receiving antenna captures all radiated energy effectively.
Frov_ken
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let's say we have a path Length AC. Point A transmits a signal at Ptransmit.
From Friis' Path Loss formula: (assumming Gain for receiver and transmitter antennae are 1.)
##P_{received} = P_{transmit} (\frac{λ}{4π* LengthAC})^2##
,when point C contains the receiver.

What if I divided this into two segments. They should still have the same answer right?
Let's say point B is somewhere between A and C.
Theoretically, the path loss in AB plus the path loss in BC should equal the path loss in AC. If I do this using the formula.

##P_{received at B} = P_{transmit} (\frac{λ}{4π* LengthAB})^2##
##P_{received at C} = P_{received at B} (\frac{λ}{4π* LengthBC})^2##

Combining these two should get me to the total of the equation before. How should I combine them? I couldn't just multiply or add them together. The math would be messy. Am I missing some assumptions here?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Frov_ken said:
Let's say we have a path Length AC. Point A transmits a signal at Ptransmit.
From Friis' Path Loss formula: (assumming Gain for receiver and transmitter antennae are 1.)
##P_{received} = P_{transmit} (\frac{λ}{4π* LengthAC})^2##
,when point C contains the receiver.

What if I divided this into two segments. They should still have the same answer right?
Let's say point B is somewhere between A and C.
Theoretically, the path loss in AB plus the path loss in BC should equal the path loss in AC. If I do this using the formula.

##P_{received at B} = P_{transmit} (\frac{λ}{4π* LengthAB})^2##
##P_{received at C} = P_{received at B} (\frac{λ}{4π* LengthBC})^2##

Combining these two should get me to the total of the equation before. How should I combine them? I couldn't just multiply or add them together. The math would be messy. Am I missing some assumptions here?
If you have two paths in tandem, they should be treated as two paths, each having two antennas and a free space attenuation. The losses in Decibels of the two paths should be added.
The reason that the answer is different to treating it as a single path is that most attenuation occurs at the start of the path, and for two paths this happens twice. For example, suppose a given path has an attenuation of 60dB. If you double the path length, it becomes only 66dB. But if the two paths are used in tandem, say by using a passive repeater, it will give 120dB.
 
  • Like
Likes Frov_ken
tech99 said:
The reason that the answer is different to treating it as a single path is that most attenuation occurs at the start of the path,
So, how do you exactly define the start of a path when something like this involves an interaction at B?
let's say there's a reflection at point B. Will it "start" a new path? or is it safe to treat the total reflected path distance and treat it as a single path loss?
 
Frov_ken said:
So, how do you exactly define the start of a path when something like this involves an interaction at B?
let's say there's a reflection at point B. Will it "start" a new path? or is it safe to treat the total reflected path distance and treat it as a single path loss?
For the two paths in tandem to be calculated as one, the receiving antenna on the first hop must be large enough to catch all the radiated energy. So it might need to be a kilometre in diameter!
For cases where the intermediate point is back-to-back dishes, passive reflectors, reflections from buildings etc etc, treat it as two paths. The repeater has its gain twice - once for receiving and again for transmitting.
 
  • Like
Likes Frov_ken
tech99 said:
For the two paths in tandem to be calculated as one, the receiving antenna on the first hop must be large enough to catch all the radiated energy. So it might need to be a kilometre in diameter!
Hmm. I think I'm getting the problem with my equation. As you said, I should be getting all energy. that just means the Friis' Path Loss Formula estimates a certain propagation area and a finite point where it is received. From the wikipedia page, I see it has assumed an isotropic case.

In the case of having reflections, I have to treat it as two paths. since it "starts" again as another wavefront.

I just clarified what you wrote in this text. Thank you!
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top