Function continuous or not at (0,0)

kottur
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f\rightarrowℝ, f(x,y)=\frac{x^{2}y}{x^{6}+y^{2}} where (x,y)\neq(0,0) and f(0,0)=0.

Is the function continuous at (0,0)?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to find the limit at (0,0) so I put y=x into the function f and got the limit 0 when x\rightarrow0. Tthen I put y=x^{2} into f and got the limit 1 when x\rightarrow0. That means that the limit does not exist right?
But the part that says f(0,0)=0 confuses me. Does that change the limit?

There is a second part for this problem where I'm supposed to find the first partial derivatives in (0,0) or explain why they do not exist but I'd like to understand this first and then try to see if I can do the second part by myself. I think that if the limit does not exist in (0,0) then the partial derivatives can not either by definition... But I'm not sure...

Thank you in advance. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kottur said:

Homework Statement



f\rightarrowℝ, f(x,y)=\frac{x^{2}y}{x^{6}+y^{2}} where (x,y)\neq(0,0) and f(0,0)=0.

Is the function continuous at (0,0)?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to find the limit at (0,0) so I put y=x into the function f and got the limit 0 when x\rightarrow0. Tthen I put y=x^{2} into f and got the limit 1 when x\rightarrow0. That means that the limit does not exist right?
But the part that says f(0,0)=0 confuses me. Does that change the limit?

There is a second part for this problem where I'm supposed to find the first partial derivatives in (0,0) or explain why they do not exist but I'd like to understand this first and then try to see if I can do the second part by myself. I think that if the limit does not exist in (0,0) then the partial derivatives can not either by definition... But I'm not sure...

Thank you in advance. :smile:
You asked:
"But the part that says f(0,0)=0 confuses me. Does that change the limit?"​
The answer is no!

The limit as (x,y) → (0.0) has nothing to do with the value of f(0,0). Indeed, this limit can exist even if f(0,0) is undefined.

By The Way: Your solution to this problem is correct. You have shown that the limit does not exist.
 
Thank you. :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top