Function describing Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a problem involving potential energy described by the function U(x,y) = x² - y² + 32 for a point mass. The user is struggling to derive the force vector F(x,y) using the equation F = -∇U and has attempted various calculus methods without success. They seek guidance on how to initiate the problem and request hints to clarify their approach. The conversation emphasizes the need to compute the gradient of the potential energy function to determine the force at specified coordinates. Assistance with showing work is encouraged to identify any errors in the user's calculations.
JC91
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, can someone please help me on this problem. I'm not sure what to do with the equation given. I tried taking the derivative, partial, and anti and nothing seems to be working. Can someone please give me a hint on how to start this problem.

Thanks in advance.

Suppose the following function describes the potential energy of a point mass (m=3 kg) at various locations in the xy plane:

U(x,y)=x2 - y2 + 32
(Units omitted; you may assume [x], [y] = m and = J.)

a.) Find a general function vector F(x,y) and then use it to find the force on the object at the following (x,y) coordinates:

vector F(+6 m,+1 m) = ___N i hat + ___N j hat

vector F(+6 m,-1 m) = ___N i hat + ___N j hat

vector F(-6 m,+1 m) = ___N i hat + ___N j hat

vector F(-6 m,-1 m) = ___N i hat + ___N j hat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the equation ##F=-\nabla U##. Maybe show us your work so we can see what's going wrong?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top