Proving Function Properties with Subsets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving properties of functions using subsets, specifically focusing on membership proofs for union and intersection of sets. Participants explore how to demonstrate that f(S∪T) equals f(S)∪f(T) and that f(S∩T) is a subset of f(S)∩f(T). There is also a query about proving surjectivity, with clarification provided on how to select elements from the codomain to establish that a function is surjective. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and applying logical reasoning to solve these mathematical problems effectively.
Enjoicube
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
Alright, 2+1/2 problems here:

First:

36. Let F be a function from the set A to the set B. Let S and T be subsets of A. Show that:

a) f(S\cupT)=f(S)\cupf(T)
b)f(S\capT)\subseteq f(S)\capf(T)

Note: This must be done using a membership proof. i.e. prove that f(S\cupT)\subseteqf(S)\cupf(T) AND f(S)\cupf(T)\subseteqf(S\cupT)


40. Let f be a function from A to B. Let S be a subset of B. We define the inverse image of S to be the subset of A whose elements are precisely all pre images of all elements of S. We denote the inverse image of S by f^{-1}(S) so f^{-1}(S)={a\inA| f(a)\inS}

Prove parts a and b of 36 substituting the inverse image for f, and an equality in both parts (rather than subset)

1) (not a question from the text). This was not covered in the lecture or in the book, but how do most people go about proving that a function is surjective from the definition?


Homework Equations


f^{-1}(S)={a\inA| f(a)\inS}
f(S)={f(s)|s\inS}


The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, I only have an idea of how to do 36, 40 I am lost. The professor said to use proof by case for 36, so here is how I thought it would go:

a) prove:f(S\cupT)=f(S)\cupf(T)

Proof:

1) assume x\in f(SUT), then, by definition x\in{f(s)|s\inSUT}

2) If x\in{f(s)|s\inSUT}, then x\in{f(s)|s\inS or T} by definition of union.

3) If x\in{f(s)|s\inS}, then x\inf(S), and since f(S)\subseteqf(S)Uf(T), thus if x\in{f(s)|s\inS} then x\in{f(s)|s\inS}\cup{f(s)|s\inT}.

4)If x\in{f(s)|s\inT}, then x\inf(T), and since f(T)\subseteqf(S)Uf(T), thus if x\in{f(s)|s\inT} then x\in{f(s)|s\inS}\cup{f(s)|s\inT}.

4)Therefore if x\inf(SUT) then x\inf(S)Uf(T)

5 Now we must prove that f(S)\cupf(T)\subseteqf(S\cupT, to do this, just invert the steps of this proof (obviously I wouldn't put this on a test but to cut length, this is reasonable)

b)f(S\capT)\subseteq f(S)\capf(T)

proof:

1) assume x\in f(S\capT), then, by definition x\in{f(s)|s\inS\capT}

2) Then x\in{f(s)|s\inS and T}.

3) Thus s\inS and s\inT and so, through simplification, we can say:

4) s\inS, if s\inS then x\in{f(s)|s\inS}

5) We can also say s\inT, and if s\inT then x\in{f(s)|s\inT}.

6) Therefore, if s\inS and s\inT, which are true, we have x\in{f(s)|s\inS} and x\in{f(s)|s\inT} (we can say through addition).

7) Note that by the definition of intersection, x\in{f(s)|s\inS}\cap{f(s)|s\inT}.

8) Therefore, if x\in{f(s)|s\inS\capT} then x\in{f(s)|s\inS}\cap{f(s)|s\inT}.

9)if x\in{f(s)|s\inS\capT} then x\in{f(s)|s\inS}\cap{f(s)|s\inT}.


10)This means f(S\capT)\subseteqf(S)\capf(T).

For Problem 40, I am wondering whether the proofs follow the same steps, or is there something else I have to worry about?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


To make this easier, forget problem 36, and 40, I can go in for help for that. Now my main question is on proving surjectivity: How is this done. I understand, you must pick a random member y0 of the codomain and prove that there is some value x0 from the domain such that f(x0)=y0, in practice however, this gives me trouble. For example, f(x)=x^2 isn't surjective on R-->R, however, it is surjective on R-->R+, how would one guarantee that the y0 value picked from the codomain reflects the restrictions put on it?
 


Enjoicube said:
To make this easier, forget problem 36, and 40, I can go in for help for that. Now my main question is on proving surjectivity: How is this done. I understand, you must pick a random member y0 of the codomain and prove that there is some value x0 from the domain such that f(x0)=y0, in practice however, this gives me trouble. For example, f(x)=x^2 isn't surjective on R-->R, however, it is surjective on R-->R+, how would one guarantee that the y0 value picked from the codomain reflects the restrictions put on it?
By saying so? If you want to prove that f(x)= x2:R-->R+ is surjective, you would start by saying "Let y be in R+." Then you are looking for x in R such that x2= y. Since y is in R+, x= y1/2 exists.
 


Aha, thank you, why it couldn't be explained as clearly as that in my text is beyond me.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top