How Can I Find the Equation for a Functional Taylor Expansion?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of finding a functional Taylor series for a functional f[\Psi] around the function \Psi \Psi^*, with \Psi^* being the complex conjugate of \Psi. The conversation also touches on the idea of expanding a function or functional about a certain point or function, and the conditions for this to be possible. The questioner also refers to a particular expression on page 234 of a PDF file, but is looking for a more general formula.
  • #1
juliette sekx
31
0
Hello,
Is there any place I can find the equation for the Taylor expansion of a functional around a function ??

Particularly, I want something like:

[itex]
f[x(t)] = f[\hat{x}(t)] + (f[\hat{x}(t)] - f[x(t)] \frac{\delta f}{\delta x(t)}|_{x(t)=\hat{x}(t)} + \frac{(f[\hat{x}(t)] - f[x(t)])^2}{2!}\frac{\delta ^2f}{\delta ^2x(t)}|_{x(t)=\hat{x}(t)} \ldots
[/itex]

Particularly I want to expand the functional:

[itex]
f[\Psi] [/itex] around the function [itex]\Psi \Psi^*[/itex] where [itex]\Psi^*[/itex] is the compex conjugate
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hello,
Is this problem completely ill-posed ??
Is there no such thing as a funcitonal taylor series ??

Is there a book where I can find the formula ??

THank you.
 
  • #3
What is [tex] \hat{x}[/tex] ? If [tex] f,x \in C^{\infty} ( \mathbb{R}) [/tex] then
[itex]f[x(t)] = f[ x( t_0 )] + \left( f[x(t)] - f[x(t_0)] \right) \frac{\delta f}{\delta x(t)}|_{ t = t_0 } + \frac{ \left( f[x(t)] - f[x(t_0 )] \right) ^2}{2!}\frac{\delta ^2f}{\delta ^2x(t)}|_{t = t_0} } + \ldots [/itex]​
forall [tex] t \in ( t_0 - \epsilon , t_0 + \epsilon) [/tex], where [tex] \epsilon [/tex] small enough.
 
  • #4
[itex]\hat{x}(t)[/itex] was supposed to be the funciton about which the series is being expanded.

What you typed out looks like just a regular taylor series (expanded about a variable), I want a functional taylor series (expanded about a FUNCTION). I realized just now that the second term should probably be negative.
 
  • #5
I'm a little skeptical of being able to make sense of expanding [itex]f[\Psi][/itex] about [itex]\Psi \Psi^*[/itex], because [itex]\Psi[/itex] and [itex]\Psi^*[/itex] are typically analytically independent of each other, so I don't expect there to be a sensible notion of "closeness".

OTOH, you do have [itex]f[\Psi] = f[\Psi \Psi^* + (\Psi - \Psi \Psi^*)][/itex], so *shrug*.
 
  • #6
Okay, I may be missing something that you typed ...
juliette sekx said:
I want a functional taylor series (expanded about a FUNCTION). I realized just now that the second term should probably be negative.

which functional space are everything occurring to ?

For example, when you said that [tex]f = g [/tex] in [tex]C(a,b)[/tex] then [tex]f (t) = g (t)[/tex] for all [tex]t \in [a,b][/tex], or, when you said that [tex]f = g [/tex] in [tex]L^1(a,b)[/tex] then
[tex]\int_{a}^b |f(t) - g(t)| dt = 0[/tex]​
etc ... So, what is [itex] f[x(t)] [/itex] ? function, number, distribution ? You write [tex] f[x(t)] = ... [/tex], what did it mean ?

juliette sekx said:
[itex]\hat{x}(t)[/itex] was supposed to be the funciton about which the series is being expanded.

pardon, which series did you mean ?
 
  • #7
Hello,

[itex]f[x(t)][/itex] is a functional of the function [itex]x(t)[/itex].

Now, just as I can expand x(t) in a series about some point [itex]\hat{t}[/itex], which will give me an approximation of x(t) near [itex]\hat{t}[/itex],

I want to expand [itex]f[x(t)][/itex] in a series about the function [itex]\hat{x}(t)[/itex], which will give me an approximation of [itex]f[x(t)][/itex] near [itex]\hat{x}(t)[/itex].



For example, let's say [itex]f[x(t)][/itex]=sin[x(t)].

I think (although I'm not sure), [itex]f[x(t)][/itex] can be written as:

[itex]f[x(t)] = x(t) - \frac{(x(t))^3}{3!} + \frac{(x(t))^5}{5!} + \ldots[/itex]

Now let's say we want to see what this functional looks like for functions close to [itex]\hat{x}(t)[/itex]=cos(t).

Again, I'm not sure, but I think the functional could be written something like:

[itex]f[x(t)] \approx cos(t) - \frac{(x(t)-cos(t))^3}{3!} + \frac{(x(t)-cos(t))^5}{5!} + \ldots[/itex]

so if x(t) is some function very similar to cos(t) ... let's say it's cos(t) with a few wiggles, then the above formula would give an approximation of [itex]f[x(t)] [/itex].

I hope that wasn't too confusing (I haven't studied calculus of variations very much). Please let me know if what I said doens't make sense.
 
  • #8
okay, now i understand what you mean. You can do that in some special cases.

If the function [tex] f[/tex] in [tex] C^\infty ( \mathbb{R}) [/tex], ie, the [tex]n [/tex]th derivative [tex]\frac{d^n f}{ dx^n} [/tex] always exists and it is a continuos function on [tex] \mathbb{R}[/tex], for all [tex]n \in \mathbb{N} [/tex]. Then you have
[tex] f(u) = f(v) + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!} \cdot \frac{d^n f}{ dx^n} (u) \, \cdot \, (u-v)^n \;\; , \; \forall u,v \in \mathbb{R} [/tex]​
where [tex]\frac{d^n f}{ dx^n} (u)[/tex] is the [tex]n [/tex]th derivative [tex]\frac{d^n f}{ dx^n} [/tex] evaluated at the point [tex] u [/tex].

Now, for all [tex] t \in \mathbb{R}[/tex], we put [tex] u = x(t) [/tex] and [tex] v = \hat{x}(t) [/tex] so that we can write
[tex] f(u) = f(v) + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!} \cdot \frac{d^n f}{ dx^n} (u) \,\cdot \, (u-v)^n[/tex]​
ie, for all [tex] t \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]
[tex] f(x(t)) = f \left( \hat{x}(t) \right) + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!} \frac{d^n f}{ dx ^n} \left( \hat{x}(t) \right) \, \cdot \, \left[ x(t)- \hat{x} (t) \right]^n[/tex]​
if [tex] f \in C^\infty ( \mathbb{R}) [/tex]

For example, if [tex]f \left( x(t) \right)=\sin x(t) [/tex] then [tex] f \in C^\infty ( \mathbb{R}) [/tex] and we have
[itex]f[x(t)] = x(t) - \frac{(x(t))^3}{3!} + \frac{(x(t))^5}{5!} + \ldots[/itex]​
where [tex] \hat{x} (t) = 0 [/tex] for all [tex]t \in \mathbb{R} [/tex], and
[itex]f(x(t)) = \sin \left( \cos(t) \right) + \sum_{k = 1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^k}{(2k) !} \sin \left( \cos t\right) \, \left( x(t) - \cos t \right) ^{2k} + \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^k}{(2k + 1) !} \cos \left( \cos t \right) \, \left( x(t) - \cos t \right) ^{2k +1} [/itex]​
where [tex] \hat{x} (t) = \cos t [/tex] for all [tex]t \in \mathbb{R} [/tex].
 
  • #9
Thank you Brahman,

That would be the intuitive way of thinking about it (defining the functional Taylor series pointwise where at each point the series is equal to the Taylor series at that point) ,

but the reason why I was asking all this is because I thought the expression was much more complicated.

On page 234 of this pdf file (It will say pg 234 in acrobat reader, but pg 226 on the actual page since the first few pages are not numbered):
http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~mscott/Notes.pdf

The funcitonal Taylor series is defined under the word "Proof" , but only for the very special case of x(t)=0.

Still, this expression is much more complicated than the one you typed out (and the ones that I was suggesting). It involves n'th degree funcitonal differentiation and multiple integrations.

I'm looking for the general expression for this formula, that is not specific to the case x(t)=0.

I hope there is a book or reference that has this formula
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
oh, the formula doesn't look familiar with me, it was more complicated than what we typed. Because i have no background of Stochastics prossess, so hope that some one else will help you with the general formula ^-^ . Anyway, the book you sent is worthy of note. Cheers!

PS: edit what I typed

[tex]
f(u) = f(v) + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!} \cdot \frac{d^n f}{ dx^n} (v) \, \cdot \, (u-v)^n \;\; , \; \forall u,v \in \mathbb{R}
[/tex]​
 
  • #11
juliette sekx said:
I'm looking for the general expression for this formula, that is not specific to the case x(t)=0.
Can't you just translate?

e.g. in the single real variable case, you can get the Taylor series for f(x) about x=a by finding the Taylor series for f(y+a) about y=0.
 
  • #12
Hurkyl said:
Can't you just translate?

e.g. in the single real variable case, you can get the Taylor series for f(x) about x=a by finding the Taylor series for f(y+a) about y=0.

I don't think it's that simple, you see how each derivative is evaluated at gamma=0 ??
If we are expanding around an arbitrary funciton, then we are evaluating these derivatives at those "functions" (not just variables) ... and that's confusing me since this book doesn't explain what [itex]\gamma_1, \gamma_2[/itex], etc. are

That's why I'd like to see this formula in a real book, not just to see the formula for the general form, but to also understand why the formula looks the way it is.

And Brahman, this functional taylor series has nothing to do with stochastic processes.. it's just used to prove something related to them. It's actually a topic of functional calculus (or 'calculus of variations')
 
  • #13
looks like this topic is dead now for a while. Still, in case anybody comes across the same question: I believe what Juliette is looking for is what is called a "Volterra Series" expansion.
 

1. What is a functional Taylor series?

A functional Taylor series is a mathematical tool used in calculus to approximate a function using a polynomial series. It is similar to a regular Taylor series, but instead of approximating a single variable function, it approximates a function that takes in other functions as its input.

2. How is a functional Taylor series calculated?

A functional Taylor series is calculated by taking derivatives of the function at a specific point and plugging them into a polynomial formula. The formula involves the function's value at the point, as well as its higher-order derivatives at that point.

3. What is the significance of a functional Taylor series?

A functional Taylor series is significant because it allows us to approximate complex functions with simpler polynomial functions. This can be useful in various fields such as physics, engineering, and economics, where precise mathematical models are needed.

4. Can a functional Taylor series be used for any type of function?

No, a functional Taylor series can only be used for functions that are analytic, which means they can be represented by a convergent power series. This excludes functions with discontinuities, vertical asymptotes, or other irregularities.

5. Are there any limitations to using a functional Taylor series?

Yes, there are limitations to using a functional Taylor series. It can only provide an approximation of a function within a certain radius of convergence, and the accuracy of the approximation decreases as the distance from the center point increases. Additionally, it may not be able to accurately represent functions with complex behavior, such as oscillations or sharp peaks.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
789
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top