Funded masters (on the way to phd) ?

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mxbob468
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Masters Phd
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the considerations of pursuing a master's degree as a pathway to a PhD, particularly in the fields of physics and mathematics. Participants explore the merits of obtaining a master's with or without a thesis, funding opportunities, and the implications of using a master's program as a bridge to a PhD.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a commitment to pursuing a PhD but acknowledges a lack of research experience and questions whether to pursue a master's with or without a thesis.
  • Another participant argues that a master's without research does not provide significant value and suggests that a thesis is essential for gaining research experience.
  • Some participants mention that while terminal master's programs may not offer funding, there could be opportunities for funding through teaching assistantships or connections to research labs.
  • There is a discussion about the potential benefits of having a master's in a related field rather than the same field as the intended PhD, with one participant sharing their experience of entering a PhD program with master's degrees in different disciplines.
  • Concerns are raised about the perception of transferring from a master's to a PhD program, with one participant stating that it is not considered cheating and that institutions generally accept such transitions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of a thesis for a master's degree and the implications of using a master's as a stepping stone to a PhD. There is no consensus on whether a master's in the same field as the PhD is advantageous.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the uncertainty regarding funding availability for master's programs and the variability in institutional policies regarding transitions from master's to PhD programs.

mxbob468
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
i'm committed to getting a phd but my undergrad career is lackluster (~3.7 gpa, pure math major physics minor, no research experience, peace corps math teacher, yet to take either gre) so i was thinking about getting a masters and doing research while completing the masters. i know people have said that this doesn't impress anyone and if it were common more students in top grad programs would come in with masters degrees. but 1 I'm doing the masters to shore up a research deficit not grade deficit (this speaks to the notion that grade inflation in grad school is common) 2 my question isn't where it's a good idea.

the questions: should one do the masters with thesis or sans thesis? is it common to have them funded (maybe by TA ship?)

haven't decided physics or math but leaning physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thesis is the research project; do a masters without research and you're not getting anything out of it. But you can probably still get into some decent programs for a PhD, and you can transfer after earning the masters if you still want to - and get it all paid for. Terminal masters programs are unlikely to fund you or have the same level of research available as a PhD program would.
 
eri said:
The thesis is the research project; do a masters without research and you're not getting anything out of it. But you can probably still get into some decent programs for a PhD, and you can transfer after earning the masters if you still want to - and get it all paid for. Terminal masters programs are unlikely to fund you or have the same level of research available as a PhD program would.

isn't that cheating (the institution)?
 
You should do an MS with thesis. The experience you get will be useful to employment... as well as enhance future possible PhD applications.

The programs are not likely to always fund you... but it's possible. Some institutions with smaller graduate programs may find you useful for TAing or grading, and sometimes, if the program has links to a national or military lab, your research could possibly occur there (and be funded).

I can't advise you one field over another, but as for using the program as a "bridge" to a PhD... it might look more "complementary" instead to have the degree in a related field rather than the identical field. I did enter a fairly well ranked institution (and especially high ranked in my field of interest) with actually TWO terminal master's degrees... but NOT in the exact same degree 'line' so too speak. My masters degrees are in engineering and education... while my PhD is in Physics. I don't know if the school would have looked at my application as favorably if I'd had just an MS in Physics. That would clearly show I was using my MS as a bridge --I'd be likely taking classes I'd likely repeat in the new program rather than building new strengths to bring with me to the new program. I'm just not sure how they'd look at that.
 
It's not uncommon for people to drop out or transfer out of a PhD program, so no, it's not seen as cheating the school. After all, they'll probably be paying you to teach your first few years, and you taught for them - they got their money's worth. They're not going to ask you to pay it back. Just don't make it very clear you plan to do this. And hey, maybe you'll like it there and decide to stay anyway. Or you can fail the quals and have them kick you out instead (that won't keep you from transferring).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K