Programs Funded masters (on the way to phd) ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mxbob468
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Masters Phd
AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a master's degree before a PhD can be a strategic move for those with a less impressive undergraduate record, particularly to gain research experience. A master's with a thesis is generally recommended, as it provides valuable research skills and enhances PhD applications. Funding for master's programs can be limited, but opportunities may exist through teaching assistantships or connections to research labs. Choosing a master's in a related field rather than the same discipline may present a more favorable application profile for PhD programs, as it demonstrates the acquisition of diverse skills. While some may view transitioning from a master's to a PhD as disingenuous, it is a common pathway, and institutions typically do not penalize students for transferring or dropping out of PhD programs. Overall, the master's degree can serve as a bridge to strengthen qualifications for future academic pursuits.
mxbob468
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
i'm committed to getting a phd but my undergrad career is lackluster (~3.7 gpa, pure math major physics minor, no research experience, peace corps math teacher, yet to take either gre) so i was thinking about getting a masters and doing research while completing the masters. i know people have said that this doesn't impress anyone and if it were common more students in top grad programs would come in with masters degrees. but 1 I'm doing the masters to shore up a research deficit not grade deficit (this speaks to the notion that grade inflation in grad school is common) 2 my question isn't where it's a good idea.

the questions: should one do the masters with thesis or sans thesis? is it common to have them funded (maybe by TA ship?)

haven't decided physics or math but leaning physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thesis is the research project; do a masters without research and you're not getting anything out of it. But you can probably still get into some decent programs for a PhD, and you can transfer after earning the masters if you still want to - and get it all paid for. Terminal masters programs are unlikely to fund you or have the same level of research available as a PhD program would.
 
eri said:
The thesis is the research project; do a masters without research and you're not getting anything out of it. But you can probably still get into some decent programs for a PhD, and you can transfer after earning the masters if you still want to - and get it all paid for. Terminal masters programs are unlikely to fund you or have the same level of research available as a PhD program would.

isn't that cheating (the institution)?
 
You should do an MS with thesis. The experience you get will be useful to employment... as well as enhance future possible PhD applications.

The programs are not likely to always fund you... but it's possible. Some institutions with smaller graduate programs may find you useful for TAing or grading, and sometimes, if the program has links to a national or military lab, your research could possibly occur there (and be funded).

I can't advise you one field over another, but as for using the program as a "bridge" to a PhD... it might look more "complementary" instead to have the degree in a related field rather than the identical field. I did enter a fairly well ranked institution (and especially high ranked in my field of interest) with actually TWO terminal master's degrees... but NOT in the exact same degree 'line' so too speak. My masters degrees are in engineering and education... while my PhD is in Physics. I don't know if the school would have looked at my application as favorably if I'd had just an MS in Physics. That would clearly show I was using my MS as a bridge --I'd be likely taking classes I'd likely repeat in the new program rather than building new strengths to bring with me to the new program. I'm just not sure how they'd look at that.
 
It's not uncommon for people to drop out or transfer out of a PhD program, so no, it's not seen as cheating the school. After all, they'll probably be paying you to teach your first few years, and you taught for them - they got their money's worth. They're not going to ask you to pay it back. Just don't make it very clear you plan to do this. And hey, maybe you'll like it there and decide to stay anyway. Or you can fail the quals and have them kick you out instead (that won't keep you from transferring).
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...

Similar threads

Back
Top