Funky Elastic Collisions: Solving for Post-Collision Velocities

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision problem involving a 10g object moving at 20cm/s and a 15g object at -30cm/s, the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations are essential for finding post-collision velocities. The momentum equation is correctly set up, but the kinetic energy equation must include squared velocities, leading to a quadratic form. The one-half in the kinetic energy equation can be canceled out, simplifying the process. Solving the linear momentum equation for one variable and substituting it into the quadratic equation allows for finding the velocities. Ultimately, this approach yields two solutions, which should be interpreted physically to understand the results of the collision.
ms. confused
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Hey hey!:biggrin:
A 10g object moving to the right with a speed of 20cm/s makes an elastic head-on collision with a 15g object moving in the opposite direction with a speed of 30cm/s. Find the velocity of each object after the collision.
So I have to come up with two equations and solve for unknown's simultaneously with plugged in values. That's one way of doing it. My solutions manual sucks at explaining the steps it took to get certain values, so I'm kind of lost on that.
So you know I'm not just trying to get out of doing homework myself, this is what I tried:
m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
(10g)(20m/s) + (-15g)(30m/s) = (10g)v1f + (15g)v2f
-250 = 10v1f + 15v2f eq'n#(1)
(10)(20) + (15)(30) = 10v1f + 15v2f
650 = 10v1f + 15v2f eq'n #(2)
I think one of these isn't quite right because for 10g, I get -45cm/s when it's actually -40cm/s and for 15g, I get 30cm/s when it's only supposed to be 10cm/s. Could someone please point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ms. confused said:
Hey hey!:biggrin:
A 10g object moving to the right with a speed of 20cm/s makes an elastic head-on collision with a 15g object moving in the opposite direction with a speed of 30cm/s. Find the velocity of each object after the collision.
So you know I'm not just trying to get out of doing homework myself, this is what I tried:
m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
(10g)(20m/s) + (-15g)(30m/s) = (10g)v1f + (15g)v2f
-250 = 10v1f + 15v2f eq'n#(1)
It is the eq. for conservation of momentum, and it is correct. But the KE is also conserved in an elastic collision, so the second equation should express conservation of the KE which is 1/2 * mv^2. So you should square the velocities in the second equation.
(10)(20)^2 + (15)(30)^2 = 10v1f^2 + 15v2f^2
ehild
 
What happens to the 1/2 in the KE equation? Is that included too? And once I get this equation, do I simultaneously solve for the unknown with the other equation? There's a problem if I do that. I won't have like terms...unless I factor...because the variables are squared. I'm still not any closer to the actual answers, though. Are you sure this is what should be done?
 
The one-half is in all of the terms, so he simply canceled it out. Think of it as multiplying both sides by 2, if you will.

You've got the right idea. You will end up with two equations - one linear in both v1 and v2, one quadratic in both. This can be solved. Probably the easiest way would be to solve the linear version for one of the speeds and plug the result into the quadratic. You'll end up with an equation quadratic in one of the speeds - multiply it out, collect similar terms, and solve it. The quadratic formula will come in handy.

Interestingly, you'll end up with two solutions. Can you interpret both of them physically?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top