FXe2 Bond Angle: 104.5° or 90°?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tanya Back
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Bond
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around determining the bond angle of the compound XeF2. The correct bond angle is concluded to be 90 degrees, based on VSEPR theory and the concept of steric number. The central atom, xenon, has a total of 8 outer electrons, with 2 used for bonding with fluorine, leaving 3 lone pairs. This results in a steric number of 5, indicating sp^3d hybridization and a trigonal bipyramidal electron geometry, while the molecular geometry is linear. The bond angle is thus 90 degrees, with some references to the Xe-F-Xe angle being 180 degrees. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying principles rather than relying solely on shortcuts for calculations.
Tanya Back
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys!

i was wondering what would be the bond angle of FXe2..would it be 104.5 or 90?

thanx
Tanya
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hello, I think the correct formula should be \displaystyle XeF_2, am I correct?

You can use VSEPR principles to find the correct geometry for this compound; just consider the electronic configurations of the two atoms with covalent bonding, not ionic one. Use 54 electrons for xenon and 9 electrons for fluorine; if they are bonded each other via covalent bonds, then one of them must come from Xe, and the other from F.

  1. Write the electronic configurations.
  2. Every atom except hydrogen obeys octet rule; I mean, the outer shell has 8 electrons. So in \displaystyle XeF_2, Xe+2F must have 3*8=24 total electrons.
  3. How many electrons are available? I think there is a shortage of electrons, and this number must be provided by mutual contributions of these three atoms via covalent bonding.
  4. Write the electropositive atom (here, xenon) in the central position, and surround it with two electronegative ones.
  5. Determine the bond order; here it is 1.
  6. Determine how many n electrons are possible; here Xe has to have some non-bonding electrons.
  7. As the central atom has some non-bonding electrons, VSEPR theory suggests that there must be a deviation of geometry. Just do the calculations and give feedback. I presume the angle will be 90°.
 
There is another way out too. If you remember the basic list of geometries (by experience of course) then you can use the following trick. Compute a quantity called the steric number which equals the sum of the number of sigma bonds and the number of lone pairs. Then the steric number can be related to hybridization and geometry. For XeF2, the Xenon atom has 8 outer electrons of which 2 are spent in bonding to flourine so effectively you have 3 lone pairs and 2 sigma bonds...means steric number = 5 so the hybridization is sp^3d and the electron geometry is trigonal bipyramidal while the molecular geometry is linear (thats the only energetically favorable way you can arrange 3 lone pairs and 2 atoms in space). The bond angle is therefore 90 degrees (some people refer to the Xe-F-Xe angle, which is 180 degrees).

Please note that this "trick" is not to be used without discretion and I mentioned it purely because it is faster. If you're a newbie you MUST follow chem_tr's advice and use this perhaps on tests or when you're really in a hurry and cannot afford to find things out on paper.

Cheers
vivek
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top