G force and rate of deceleration

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lawrence fickett
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deceleration Force Rate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between an accelerometer's negative output and the rate of deceleration in motor vehicles. It is established that while the negative output is related to deceleration, it is not exactly proportional; the accuracy depends on the quality of the accelerometer used. The output signal can be plotted against actual negative acceleration, and specifications for the accelerometer model will provide necessary details. Proper mounting of the accelerometer is crucial for accurate measurements, as improper placement can lead to erroneous data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of accelerometer specifications and performance metrics
  • Knowledge of basic physics concepts, particularly acceleration and deceleration
  • Familiarity with data plotting techniques and analysis
  • Experience with engineering units, specifically g's and their conversion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "accelerometer specifications" to understand performance variations
  • Study "derivative functions in physics" for predicting deceleration rates
  • Learn about "linear vs. angular acceleration" and their measurement techniques
  • Explore "data visualization tools" for plotting accelerometer output
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for automotive engineers, researchers in vehicle dynamics, and anyone involved in the design and implementation of accelerometer systems for measuring deceleration.

lawrence fickett
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
gee i am not worthy of being here with you guys but i must know is an accelerometer's negative output due to the braking of a motor vehicle directly proportional to the the rate of deceleration of the motor vehicle and can this be predicted using a derivative function? And if I were to plot the negative g's how would the deceleration rate plot compare.

Sorry to bother you'se with such a trivial question, but I've been researching this and can't seem to get a definitive answer. I am preparing a patent using the above and don't want to make a claim that can't be proven.

Many Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that you have already converted the accelerometer output signal to engineering units of g's, it should be directly related to the rate of deceleration. 1g = 9.80665 m/s2.
 
lawrence fickett said:
is an accelerometer's negative output due to the braking of a motor vehicle directly proportional to the the rate of deceleration of the motor vehicle
Not exactly proportional, but the better (and usually more expensive) the accelerometer is, the closer to that ideal it will be. There will be a data sheet or other specification for the particular model that you're working with. It will include the details for that particular model, including (most likely) a plot of the output signal as a function of the actual negative acceleration.

If you haven't already, you might try googling for "accelerometer specifications".
 
lawrence fickett said:
is an accelerometer's negative output due to the braking of a motor vehicle directly proportional to the the rate of deceleration of the motor vehicle

You would hope so.

As Nugatory said, not all accelerometers are perfect. Not all are designed to measure negative acceleration (eg deceleration) as well as positive. You would hope the designer picked one that was suitable.
 
I suppose we should also check that the accelerometer is mounted on the car body and not something loose inside the car like a box of tissues or a passenger.

Likewise an accelerometer mounted on the wheels (measuring angular acceleration) could be used to calculate the linear acceleration/deceleration but only if the wheels aren't skidding.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
886
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K