G Parity Operator Calculation for Neutral and Charged Pion States

  • Thread starter Thread starter kakarukeys
  • Start date Start date
kakarukeys
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
why G parity = (-1)^I C?
C is the Charge conjugation number of the neutral member.

G parity of \pi^0 is very obvious. Given e^{i\pi I_2} |I\ 0\rangle = (-1)^I |I\ 0\rangle

How do you compute the G parity of \pi^+?

G parity operator
G = Ce^{i\pi I_2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at http://ej.iop.org/links/q19/gde,d+XMMgTmN65bCrJ,UA/ejv11i2p99.pdf
or
http://www.phys.uAlberta.ca/~gingrich/phys512/latex2html/node64.html

Charge conjugation is determined by how physical entities (like the E field) change if you replace a charge by its opposite(this is what the charge conjugation operator does)...For example E will be come -E if you replace q by -q

marlon

to see how it is done : www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~kass/P780_L6_sp03.ppt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top