Galilean Transformations and Postulates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the nature of Galilean transformations, specifically how they apply to uniform and accelerated reference frames. It highlights that while standard transformations assume constant velocity, modifications can be made to account for time-dependent velocities without altering the time between events. The transformation for uniformly accelerated frames is presented as (t,x) → (t,x + 0.5*g*t²), which still preserves the necessary conditions for simultaneous events. In contrast, the discussion notes that in relativity, transformations must preserve the invariant quantity (ct)² - (x)², leading to the Poincaré group, which only allows uniform boosts. Overall, Arnold's interpretation suggests that classical mechanics permits time-dependent boosts, unlike relativistic frameworks.
RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
I read that the form of a galilean transformation on the point (t,x) is the following:

constant velocity transform by velocity v: (t,x) ---> (t,x+vt)
translation transform by (t0,x0): (t,x)--->(t+t0,x+x0)
rotation transformation by rotation matrix R: (t,x)--->(t,Rx)

and that it is based on the following postulates: two observers observe the same time between events, and two observers measure the same distance for simultaneous events.

My question is, based on those two postulates, couldn't you modify the first transform to

(t,x)--->(t,x+vf(t))

This transformation preserves the time between events (it doesn't change time at all). It also preserves simultaneous distance:

|(x1+vf(t))-(x2+vf(t))|=|x1-x2|
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, doesn't that just correspond to moving with an arbitrary velocity v(t)=vf(t)?
 
darkSun said:
Yeah, doesn't that just correspond to moving with an arbitrary velocity v(t)=vf(t)?

Yeah, but unfortunately the book I'm using (Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, V. Arnold) emphasizes that v is uniform.

If you take the simplest case of a uniformily accelerated reference frame, then the transformation would look like:

(t,x)--->(t,x+.5*g*t2)

This transformation preserves the time between two events, and the distance between simultaneous events. So two observers, one uniformily accelerating with respect to the other, observe the same time between events and the same distance between simultaneous events.

So according to Arnold, such a transformation is a gallilean transformation.

Bringing in relativity, things are much different. Instead of preserving time between events and distance between simultaneous events separately, you consider transformations that preserve:

(ct)^2-(x)^2

Here you can show that the Poincare group (as opposed to the gallilean group) is a 10-parameter group consisting of uniform boosts, rotations, and translations. The boosts have to be uniform and can't be a function of spacetime.

But it seems in classical mechanics, according to Arnold, you can have boosts that depend on time (so reference frames can be accelerated), although not space.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top